Mail Archive Search: <+from:turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU>

Results:

References: [ +from:turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] QSK clicking (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:08:38 -0700; Hi Jim: I know what you mean. I tried potting the relay in the back for T/R and got some silence that way, but you need to be very careful to use the right potting compound, not to eat the traces. As; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00239.html (9,288 bytes)
2. [TenTec] QSK clicking (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:11:15 -0700; Your OMNI VI has a silent in the mechanical relay? Good for you. I believe it may be a difference in hearing here. I hear the relay, many don't. It does make noise. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00241.html (8,072 bytes)
3. [TenTec] QSK clicking (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:31:23 -0700; Well, there is a sound. It has a mechanical relay (unless the OMNI VI+ did away with mechanical relay in t/r) and that is not silent. Some don't hear it, some are bothered by it. Ten Tec has suggesti; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00245.html (8,384 bytes)
4. [TenTec] QSK clicking (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:34:12 -0700; This would be interesting to know. Has the OMNI VI+ eliminated the mechanical relay for t/r?? This was necessary for some of the good specs for the OMNI VI as I understood that design. Isolation is n; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00246.html (8,789 bytes)
5. Fw: [TenTec] QSK clicking (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:13:23 -0700; Now, my impression was that the replacement of pin diodes with reed relays for the OMNI VI was an intentional decision having to do with better isolation for t/r.... and not a cost decision. I have n; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00281.html (8,682 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Clique and Claque (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:23:10 -0700; I suppose my own standards were set by the Triton IV and then the Argonaut 515. Don't have recent recollection of the Triton (is there any relay other than for an amp?) but the 515 was so quiet with; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00282.html (8,659 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Need model 220 filter (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:11:21 -0700; Hello All - Like a silly ham I went and sold my spare model 220 filter from my OMNI VI after installing INRADs. I now want to see the difference between the ladder and lattice filters and need the 22; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00389.html (6,885 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Want 220 stock filter (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:02:08 -0700; Hello All - I am still looking for the stock 2.4 KHz SSB filter for my OMNI, the model 220. If anyone has a spare, I would love to have it. Clark WA3JPG now in San Luis Obispo, CA. -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00548.html (6,845 bytes)
9. [TenTec] OMNI-VI PBT position (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:17:30 -0700; Many on this list have noted the slight PBT movements required for the "sound" to be right on the OMNI (Corsair). It has previously been noted that the model 220, 2.4 KHz stock SSB filter (have a spa; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00553.html (7,614 bytes)
10. [TenTec] noise in receivers (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:28:37 -0700; Is there any simple explanation about why the OMNI V and VI are known to be "quiet" receivers relative to the crystal oscillators. The rigs use a PL VFO, right? Then they mix with crystal oscillators; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00554.html (7,545 bytes)
11. [TenTec] OMNI-VI PBT position (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:47:23 -0700; Yes, the INRAD filters contain transformers. I think they are lattice type as opposed to the NS ladder filters. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00559.html (7,041 bytes)
12. [TenTec] OPTION 3 upgrade (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 18:29:51 -0700; Clock set for OMNI VI with option 3: choose USER MENU 1, (press LOCK button down for 2 seconds to get to the menu, press "1" to get menu 1), Select item CCd. Enter hours and minutes, beginning with a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00005.html (8,020 bytes)
13. [TenTec] OPTION 3 upgrade (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 20:50:36 -0700; Hi Bruce - A common problem is the filters break loose because the UPS gorillas have a party. Open the rig and pull the main filters out and carefully push the pins back in to make sure they are snug; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00008.html (8,301 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Trouble Tuning in CW Signals (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 18:18:15 -0700; You say 1st and 2nd IF filters, so I assume you have an OMNI V or VI. I would check the PBT and make sure it is somewhere near the center. Then hit the sidetone to make sure you have a rough idea of; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00073.html (7,886 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Some Rig Comparisons (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:17:15 -0700; If I read the comparison correctly, you used the Triton IV with the AF CW filter engaged and then tried to get the FT-1000 and the OMNI VI to sound the same using their filtering systems? It may not; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00225.html (7,756 bytes)
16. [TenTec] FS: TenTec Corsair II system (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 08:16:02 -0700; Can you explain what you mean by this? The Corsair II has the exact same two main crystal filters as the OMNI's and the Paragon in the same IF configuration. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00257.html (7,548 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Mobile Triton (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 10:03:23 -0700; I had always used a cheap Astatic crystal mike for mobiling and portable with my Triton IV back in 1978. It may be large, but is light and did quite well for me with simple Hustlers. Clark WA3JPG --; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00283.html (7,063 bytes)
18. [TenTec] fair price (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 14:32:22 -0700; Oh, here we go again.... Now, we don't have to bash other radios to defend our beloved Ten Tec rigs. It really doesn't help, especially since it is not (objectively) true. Simple facts: 1. Ten Tec ra; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00271.html (9,328 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Sell model 288, 1.8 SSB filter (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:55:11 -0700; I have the 1.8 KHz SSB filter for the 2nd IF of the OMNI's and Corsairs (and Delta I?) and it is a spare. $55 shipped to you. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submi; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00327.html (6,765 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Triton IV vers Corsair II (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 19:27:03 -0700; Just a quick comment, the AGC in the Corsair, the "hang" time constant, wasn't very good in my opinion. I imagine that might be half or more of the difference you are hearing. If you can turn the AGC; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00382.html (7,713 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]