Mail Archive Search: <+from:turner@rome.ics.uci.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:turner@rome.ics.uci.edu: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] WTB: Ten-Tec General coverage shortwave receiver... (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 18:28:30 -0700; Ten Tec makes several general coverage recievers today, they are in the catalog. I have the little synthesized superhet one that they kit for about $200, and while I don't like the tuning rates at al; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00485.html (7,540 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Delta II / Argonaut II review? (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 18:52:56 -0700; Can you tell us exactly how the review killed the Delta and Argonaut? What was wrong with the review, I actually have a copy here. It would be good to know what you think on this, I have looked over; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00491.html (7,085 bytes)
43. [TenTec] OMNI upgrade numbers? (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 17:00:46 -0700; Can anyone give me a rough idea of where Ten Tec is at with the upgrade schedule? I have number 508, and I need plenty of warning to get my OMNI in for some service before the upgrade, and to sell en; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00034.html (7,064 bytes)
44. [TenTec] [KENWOOD] TS-850s QSK (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ICS.UCI.EDU (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:39:21 -0700; Very good point, and I agree wholeheartedly. The tradeoffs are made in the designs (cost/performance, CW vs SSB, all sorts of stuff cause you can't build the perfect radio for all uses.....) and tha; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00230.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 44
Page: [1] [2] [3]