Mail Archive Search: <+from:turner@safety.ics.uci.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:turner@safety.ics.uci.edu: 263 ]

Total 263 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Poping in receiver???? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:38:04 -0800; ....the same 'action' 'appropriate' for the CORSAIR II, PARAGON, OMNI V .... I don't understand. Can you explain what the corrective action actually is. There has never been a problem with these radi; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00082.html (8,364 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Difference between Corsair 1 and 2 (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 19:14:22 -0800; The list archives should have a couple of messages on this topic. There really is no big difference. The receiver strip is the same, well, the main filter got moved from one board to another in the C; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00349.html (7,776 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Paragon I evaluation? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 20:45:42 -0800; Anyone have the Paragon and can compare it to the Corsair II and/or OMNI VI (or OMNI V)? I like both SSB and CW operation, and am not a contest operator. I like to SWL too. I would put a CW filter in; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00020.html (7,855 bytes)
4. [TenTec] omni VI micro chirp (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:39:41 -0800; I would not go so far as to discount those who complain about the little edge to the OMNI VI CW note. They have a legitimate complaint, even if it is something that would not bother others. However,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00116.html (8,405 bytes)
5. [TenTec] DSP Units? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 06:11:52 -0800; Hi Ross: You know, I just had a DSP 59+ in my shack for a while and then I had the NIR-10 with latest (version 4) firmware. They are cool for fiddling with, but did not quite increase the s/n ratio f; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00137.html (8,537 bytes)
6. [TenTec] FS: TenTec Paragon and accy's (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:44:26 -0800; Hello, I make this post for another ham, please do not email or call me, I do not have the equipment here, I make this list as a favor. I do not know the condition of the equipment, so do speak with; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00207.html (7,145 bytes)
7. [TenTec] FS / FT TenTec Paragon plus accy's (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:46:32 -0800; I forgot to say that Cliff will consider a trade of the Paragon + supply + tuner for a late serial number Kenwood TS-940S/AT. Again, Cliff is at (626) 969 9454 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00208.html (6,864 bytes)
8. [TenTec] email address for International Radio (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:16:09 -0800; Hi John: I don't think they exist, and haven't been there for some years. INRAD is their successor, up in Oregon, you can find them by searching the web. There is some service remnant of IRCI, I beli; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00288.html (7,217 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Ten Tec "fans" vs Ten Tec appreciation for engineering reasons (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 16:15:53 -0800; Hello All: I understand a lot of the defensive attitude towards Ten Tec, who wants to hear them criticized? However, I also believe that Ten Tec service can handle themselves without the anecdotes us; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00066.html (8,489 bytes)
10. [TenTec] INRAD 2.8 kHz filters (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 09:31:13 -0800; George said they would arrive sometime this month, I know they expect them in the next few weeks. I expect that his supplier is a bit behind. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ten; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00078.html (6,981 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Re: INRAD vs. TenTec - Yes Please (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 10:32:13 -0800; The INRAD CW filters are all 8 pole filters. The Ten Tec filters are 8 pole for the 9 MHz IF with 500 Hz bandwidth (217?) but all the other CW filters for 9 or 6.3 MHz IF are 6 pole filters (282, 285; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00091.html (7,997 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Phone versus CW Use (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 12:17:12 -0800; Well, from a dedicated CW and Phone (and Ten Tec) user - You COULD spend double your money and get the FT 1000D, and I think it is a somewhat nicer rig for SSB, the audio coming from the speaker and; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00105.html (7,796 bytes)
13. [TenTec] VI+ Key Up Spike (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 08:45:27 -0800; I never noticed a key up spike on my two OMNI VI's. I used to use a Hercules I, an amp that is VERY sensitive to such spikes. My TS 940 and TS 440 gave it problems all the time, but the OMNI VI was a; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00206.html (7,474 bytes)
14. [TenTec] FS filters (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 13:54:31 -0800; I have a spare model 220 SSB filter for the 9 MHz IF, works in all Ten Tec rigs other than the Delta and Scout I believe. It is a good option for the Corsair I and the Argosy I and II, and can be wir; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00223.html (7,359 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Corsair vs. Omni??? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 18:56:18 -0800; You know, all my Corsairs (and I have had several) had some IF filter blowby, even through the two IF's. I recall replacing switching diodes and other things to try to eliminate it, but it was still; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00249.html (7,623 bytes)
16. [TenTec] 'Lil PTO' (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 11:15:14 -0800; Hi Eric! Yes, it sounds like a PTO rebuild is needed. It is not hard, just requires some patience and time. You can try the "heat and lube" trick, get a hair dryer, remove the dial and skirt to expos; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00315.html (7,472 bytes)
17. [TenTec] FS model 220, 2.4 KHz SSB filter (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 06:59:08 -0800; I have a spare model 220, 8 pole 2.4 KHz SSB filter for the 9 MHz IF, it will augment your Corsair I or Argosy. It can also be wired in for the older Argonauts to produce better SSB receive. I would; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00362.html (7,208 bytes)
18. [TenTec] OMNI VI filter bypassing? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 07:05:56 -0800; Hello All - I just got my INRAD 2.8 KHz SSB filter for my OMNI 9 MHz IF. It does indeed help the PBT to work a bit more to spec and seems to be fine. However, with the 2.4 KHz filter in the 6.3 MHz I; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00363.html (8,029 bytes)
19. [TenTec] OMNI VI, 2.8 KHz INRAD filter (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 20:15:27 -0800; Well, I did not get to check the CW note yet, but did wire a simple 220 ohm resistor in series with a .1 uf cap and ran across the 1.8 KHz filter position in the 6.3 MHz IF so that I could hear the 2; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00376.html (7,497 bytes)
20. [TenTec] new INRAD 2.8 filter (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 20:07:40 -0800; One quick informal test reveals that the CW note of my OMNI VI is just fine. However, I want to get hold of someone who has heard the OMNI VI note "sagging" on the rise, so I can get a critical ear.; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00391.html (7,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]