Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Paragon 585 vs 586 (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:30:02 -0400
Ken - The Paragon II can be easily discerned to be a "II" because it is easy to see from the front panel right under the Ten-Tec logo. The original Paragon just has "Paragon" on the front panel. This
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00519.html (11,399 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Paragon (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:52:32 -0400
Jim - K1QCF Like your dual rig setup, two complete stations....Neat! Sorry, but I do not have an RS232 board and cable assembly any longer. I had one but it was sold some time ago to a ham in Holland
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00544.html (7,157 bytes)

23. [TenTec] OMNI 6+ (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:45:52 -0400
Hello - Can anyone tell me when the OMNI 6 Plus production was discontinued by Ten-Tec? 73 - Don. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00784.html (6,330 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:43:43 -0400
Don Rasmunsen - Thanks for the info. I happen to have one of the late OMNI 6+ rigs with all the new boards and surface-mounted components and with the VCXO factory done as you mentioned. Only thing i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00795.html (8,641 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:27:34 -0400
Barry - Boards changed from early models are: (New boards listed are green). Logic Bd, with VCXO, FM board with surface mtd components, also the control board, first mixer, PBT board, IF/AF board. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00799.html (8,856 bytes)

26. [TenTec] Ant couplers (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:45:53 -0400
Hi - All you guys seem to be arguing about an antenna coupler. Why the fuss? Who cares what they are called? They just transfer power to antennas, balanced or otherwise. Thought this was a Ten-Tec fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00020.html (7,053 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] PLEASE remove me from ten tec contesting emaillistthank's K7TST (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:51:47 -0400
John - just use "unsubscribe" and your password Don, ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01238.html (8,707 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:41:11 -0400
Larry - The VCXO in an OMNI 6+ is on the rear left corner of the logic board. In plain sight after the top cover is removed. Great improvement if it is facorty installed. Don, VE1BN _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00489.html (8,047 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:04:24 -0400
Larry W5VHP - When you had the cover off your OMNI 6+, you probably saw the boards have surface mounted components. Earlier production units did not. Mine does, and it is a late 1999. Glad you found
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00635.html (9,214 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Top Cover (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:38:07 -0400
Bill, Have you called Ten-Tec about a replacement cover? Covers all fit the Paragons, OMNI 5 and the sixes, etc. Guess you probably already have, just this is just in case....you didn't. 73 - Don ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00947.html (7,868 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:51:50 -0400
Did you give yourr password when you unsubscribed? Like "Unsubscribe --"? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01002.html (8,929 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] chirp in Omni 6 plus (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:52:06 -0400
Hi Jamie - I have an OMNI 6+ that came with a logic chip Model 564 Version 1.03 installed. Because of my call, and to cure the problem, Ten-Tec sent me a Vers 1.02 chip. It completely cleared any "un
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01230.html (8,768 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Apartment antenna help (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:24:21 -0400
Al - I have a coax cable running from my apartment up the window well to the roof antennas. It is a long run of 9913 to the roof antenna switch box at 35 meters up along the brick wall. I wanted to l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01247.html (9,014 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo list 3 April 2006 (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:16:38 -0300
Suggest you keep this private. Use "sales @ ten-tec.com" instead of here. Sure would not give my VISA over this net. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00092.html (11,693 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] 6 m transverter recommendation? (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:18:30 -0300
What is your email adr? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00231.html (8,225 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Alignment tools for Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:36:11 -0300
Lew - Why do you have to align your OMNI 6+? What is wrong with it that you feel you must? I'm just curious..... 73, Don _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00441.html (7,730 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:52:56 -0300
Your email address, Paul? It is not listed in QRZ.com Diode might be jumpered because it is open? I have a few BA542 to spare. You can call Ten-Tec and get some sent to you very easily, and very inex
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00533.html (8,787 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:02:44 -0300
Paul - Sorry about the wrong diode number..... the ones I have are the right ones, the BA482. No idea why my fingers typed another version I had. Don, VE1BN __________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00535.html (8,780 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] [CW] Keyer? (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:56:29 -0300
Paul - I have a Super CMOS 3 that was iambic. I too hate that, so made a small board that fits in the case which makes it non-iambic, the Ultimatic keying. Works great. Could not find an email addres
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00812.html (8,108 bytes)

40. [TenTec] keyer (score: 1)
Author: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:57:50 -0300
Hello Hank - K7HP, Could not send to you direct as can't find your email address in QRZ.com or in buckmasters. I guess you would not have a problem with your CMOS4. It is an iambic keyer which means
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00855.html (7,997 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu