Mail Archive Search: <+from:vhklein@ptd.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:vhklein@ptd.net: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI - Binding of main tuning knob (not a dragadjustment issue) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 07:07:16 -0400; On my Paragon I found a drop of light oil on the shaft made the tuning smooth as silk again. Drag was still adjustable via the knob if desired. =Vic= WA4THR -- -- Subject: [TenTec] OMNI VI - Binding; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00460.html (8,097 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] Paragon manual/Giehl chip docs? (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:30:34 -0400; The Giehl chip is similar to the standard Paragon control except the number pad switches bands, so entering a direct frequency input requires pressing <enter> before and after the number entry. You'l; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00603.html (8,163 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions? (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:41:30 -0400; You would be hard-pressed to find a better option than the Paragon. It is a very enjoyable radio and often available at bargain prices, considering its capabilities and performance. I certainly enjoy; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00129.html (10,699 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] Paragon RTTY (FSK) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:23:12 -0400; I have a 585 Paragon and have used it on CW, SSB, and RTTY. I use a Kantronics KAM that I have had for many years with 3 different rigs to interface with the computer through the computer RS-232 port; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00154.html (9,608 bytes)
125. Re: [TenTec] Paragon RTTY (FSK) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:15:22 -0400; No, I haven't experimented with reversing tones (although I have reversed mark/space to copy someone who was operating "backward). Frankly, I am not even certain I have an offset issue. When I check; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00160.html (9,917 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] Paragon RTTY (FSK) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 07:17:28 -0400; Good thought. I'll have to dig around and see if I can find the KAM manual and what the Paragon is expecting for a tuned signal. I never had to worry about that before, it just worked, but back when; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00207.html (9,654 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] Paragon RTTY (FSK) (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:37:41 -0400; You are right, I had forgotten that I used a pull-up resistor and the 12vdc jack to allow keying the Paragon via the FSK connections. I also run a small fan when running extended RTTY. If I can shift; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00261.html (9,676 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:28:15 -0500; As Ten Tec's first synthesized HF radio, I think some maligned the Paragon unfairly. There were some teething issues (reminds me of what you read on the Orion) due to some mechanical soldering proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00501.html (9,143 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] Paragon mic (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:05:11 -0500; I have a Shure 444 that I used on my old Triton, but an Argonne AR-57 dual-element crystal mic always got better reports. On my Paragon I use a TT-705 and get unsolicited compliments on the transmit; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00560.html (8,198 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] Help (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:10:31 -0500; Hey, Ken, and congrats on the new radio. Not quite enough info to help much, but that tripping of the P/S is designed to prevent a final meltdown and TT's preferred protection method rather than scal; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01027.html (8,380 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] Airpax circuit breaker for Orion (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:48:05 -0500; Ten Tec design philosophy for radio finals is to run them full power into any load, rather than folding back the power as SWR increases. The only potential for damage then is if the finals draw too m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00046.html (10,782 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] RS-232 Control codes for PARAGON (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:38:08 -0500; Yes, I use computer control of my 585 Paragon all the time using a program I wrote based on some of the original Ten Tec program concepts. My logging program (HyperLog) also interfaces with the Parag; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00180.html (8,749 bytes)
133. [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:39:50 -0500; I have a very nice 585 Paragon that I recently decided to run some RTTY with. I am connecting with a Kantronics KAM to the Mark/Space jack on the rear panel to run "true" FSK, and selecting RTTY (shi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00035.html (8,357 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:01:55 -0500; Thanks for the reply, Bob. I don't think it is a problem with the shift. My receive technique is usually to tune until the mark or space moves off the LED indicators on the KAM, note the frequencies,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00039.html (13,588 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:38:49 -0500; I have just used the RIT to offset the receive when needed, Paul. Not a big problem at all and has, so far, only come up when working stations running AFSK. I need to make a few more contacts, perhap; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00052.html (8,757 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Paragon on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:47:04 -0500; Well, I took Stan's comment to mean they used the BFO for LSB to also serve for RTTY without allowing a different offset. That being said, a later direct comment from him said he had forgotten about; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00053.html (9,086 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Paragon knob (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:03:15 -0500; I think the skirt adjustment was a later offering on the Omni VI, perhaps, and is sometimes retrofitted to the Paragon. Still, the drag on the main tuning knob is adjustable and controlled by some co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00418.html (8,133 bytes)
138. [TenTec] KR 1-A Keyer (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:37:33 -0400; I recently picked up a clean Ten Tec KR 1-A Keyer, because I love my old Ten Tec paddles that I have on my homebrew keyer and this matched the color (woodgrain/cream) of my old Triton I. I was thinki; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00433.html (7,233 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem Solving Info Needed (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:36:46 -0400; Nice sleuthing! Thanks for reporting back, always nice to know how these things work out. =Vic= WA4THR Problem solved. Bad 1N914 diode on the Logic board not allowing ROM access for the transition fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00082.html (7,750 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:44:52 -0400; Carl's comments about the band stacking registers is true, but substituting a readily available Giehl chip provides 585 with the same user interface and band stacking registers as the 586. Of more im; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00158.html (9,759 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]