Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vhklein@ptd.net: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Orion Tuner - Answers from LDG (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:49:21 -0500
My old TS-930S/AT internal tuner would not be in the circuit on receive and I actually found that to be an advantage as receivers are a lot more tolerant of a typical antenna mismatch, much more than
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00694.html (8,875 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Omni V / 301 (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:11:10 -0500
This site and some others I've seen are sensitive to the type of web browser you are using. I saw nothing when using Firefox, but everything came up find in MS Internet Explorer. Try that. =Vic= WA4T
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00595.html (8,671 bytes)

163. [TenTec] Re: Paragon (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:07:28 -0500
Hello, Kurt. I think the Paragon may be the best value in premium HF rigs on the used market. I have a 585 Paragon and absolutely love it! The RF section is virtually the same as the Omni V, but it u
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00633.html (9,620 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] Out of ham band modification (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:23:16 -0500
Just to jump in, Harry, the Paragon shifts the LP filters on a frequency basis, not a band basis (you can hear the relays shift as you tune). The appropriate filter is in place when receiving 60m and
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00761.html (8,007 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & 960 Power Supply (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:09:27 -0500
Do a search on the reflector. I recall the 960 was designed for use with the Corsair and was rated for something like 20 amps, whjile the Paragons and Omnis required 22 amps as supplied by the 961 an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01054.html (8,226 bytes)

166. [TenTec] Losing memories in Paragon (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:44:18 -0500
I have a model 585 Paragon with a v.6 Giehl chip that has performed beautifully and is my all-time favorite rig. It had the trickle-charge option from the factory and uses a NiCd battery for maintain
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00180.html (7,610 bytes)

167. [TenTec] Paragon RS-232 control with Giehl chip (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:51:00 -0500
I just obtained a model 258 RS-232 board for my Paragon. As I have a Giehl chip installed, the command structure is a bit different than the standard Ten Tec set as in their BASIC control program. Be
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00189.html (7,041 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] Losing memories in Paragon (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:32:32 -0500
Well, thanks to a hot tip emailed in from Wayne, VE3CE, I found out that ther IS a mod to the voice board for this very problem. I called Ten Tec this morning and Don confirmed I needed to install on
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00207.html (8,163 bytes)

169. [TenTec] RS232 Serial Interface for Paragon 585 problems (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:06:40 -0500
I recently obtained a model 258 RS-232 interface for my 585 Paragon with a v6.0 Giehl chip. I have not been able to get anything going either to or from the board using either HyperLog (has settings
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00243.html (7,441 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] Giehl Chip Versions (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:18:39 -0500
My 585 Paragon (S/N 70A10182) originally had a Ten Tec ROM chip labeled "8161 v 4.0" which indicated it had the new Major Loop board (81338 Rev C) installed. It was replaced with a Giehl v.6.0 chip.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00291.html (8,628 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] Paragon memories (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:23:17 -0500
Hey, Jim! Congrats on the new Paragon. I also have a 585 model and absolutely LOVE it. Look around for the Giehl chip as it adds some nifty functionality to the original Paragon, making operating it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00673.html (9,043 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] RS232 Serial Interface for Paragon 585 problems - update (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:35:13 -0500
Just for the record, my model 258 RS232 board for my 585 Paragon is now working, thanks to a tip from Don Prouty at Ten Tec. Seems later versions of that board included a 10M resistor across the crys
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00674.html (7,624 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] Which autotuner???? (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:58:59 -0500
I use an LDG Z100 with my Paragon. The problem with these small autotuners is that the Ten Tec radios do not fold back the power at high SWR levels and can exceed the capability of the tuner until a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00801.html (9,393 bytes)

174. [TenTec] Computer control of Paragon with Giehl Chip (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:30:40 -0500
After finally finding an RS-232 board for my 585 Paragon with a Giehl upgrade, I set out to modify the original BASIC program that allows computer control of the radio. After some fiddling for the se
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01100.html (7,643 bytes)

175. Re:[TenTec] OMNI V Low Output With Certain Antennas Question (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:59:42 -0400
Many wattmeters display what appears to be the sum of forward and reflected power amounts, so they read high with any reflected power at all. Also, in doing some comparisons here I rarely get much ag
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00429.html (8,424 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] DC Cable for Triton IV -- 540? (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:21:08 -0400
My Triton I and 251 power supply use the 6-blade non-Molex connectors with mounted plugs on each unit. =Vic= WA4THR connector every imagine TT would number. digital display. The Triton's power
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00799.html (8,812 bytes)

177. Re:[TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:33:54 -0400
I had good experience running a ClearSpeech speaker mobile, so when I got a deal on another unit I grabbed it. These are extremely effective adaptive noise reduction DSP units made by NCT (Noise Canc
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00030.html (8,893 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 05:50:09 -0400
I did fiddle around with some shielding, rerouting wiring, and added filtering without success. There is at least one transformer on the CS board, and I suspect that the field near the TT power suppl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00052.html (9,101 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] Argo RF In to computer Speakers.. (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:11:33 -0400
Get a couple of snap-together ferrite cores from Radio Shack, the bigger square ones are nice. Wrap the speaker leads from the computer through them several times. Problem gone. =Vic= WA4THR
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00472.html (7,776 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] Differences in Paragon I and II? (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:02:11 -0400
Good comparison. Note that by substituting a Giehl chip for the original chip in the PI (a simple plug-in install) you get the band-stacking registers and one-touch changing to any band as well. This
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00736.html (8,394 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu