Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w3sz@comcast.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Radcom product reviews (score: 1)
Author: w3sz@comcast.net (w3sz)
Date: Sun Jul 6 16:45:13 2003
Hi, I enjoy RadCom, and the reviews are more direct than in our US journals, but you have to read the text fully to get the full story, and not just scan the Headline and the Conclusions. The strong
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00197.html (10,569 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Is this how it is done today?...NO (score: 1)
Author: "w3sz" <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:33:52 -0400
Hi Chip! I have read the emails, and you clearly DID have an agreement with W5YE, which he acknowledged. Any attempt he makes to say otherwise is just rationalization, an attempt to hide the truth. B
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00640.html (12,935 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Re : [Elecraft] Trying to improve the K2's IIP3;mission (almost...) impossible! (score: 1)
Author: "w3sz" <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:39:38 -0400
Hi, Leif, I thought you would like to see this. I don't think Bill understands your measurements. I enclosed his email address for you, as well ;) 73, Roger W3SZ -- Original Message -- From: <btippet
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00657.html (13,292 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1)
Author: "w3sz" <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 06:49:59 -0400
Hello, All! I believe there was some brief discussion in this forum recently about what Leif, SM5BSZ, has to say about / showed about transmitter noise and a variety of commercial rigs currently in u
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00242.html (10,939 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay clicks and psychoacoustics (score: 1)
Author: "w3sz" <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:25:44 -0400
Hello, All! I don't think all of the perceived differences in the 'loudness' of reed relay clicks comes from differences in the transceivers. Mechanical 'clicks' have a lot of high frequency content
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00331.html (10,776 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 7800 reviews (score: 1)
Author: w3sz <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:11:47 -0400
There is a separate 7800 reflector. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ic7800/ 73, Roger Rehr W3SZ http://www.qsl.net/w3sz On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:44:34 -0500, WD4K <WD4K2@Charter.net> wrote: A couple of w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00559.html (8,156 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Am I the only one ? (score: 1)
Author: w3sz <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:07:29 -0500
You got a new rig. Be Happy. Now Go Away and Stop Bothering Us. On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 23:45:54 +0100, Eric SENSI <eric.sensi@skynet.be> wrote: Hello you all, I'd like to say that I do not really agree
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00972.html (8,970 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] usb to serial (score: 1)
Author: w3sz <w3sz@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:45:12 -0400
I have several Keyspan units, model USA-49 WLC, which is a USB to 4 Serial port adapters. They are more expensive than many of the alternatives, and for me, anyway, have been problematic as noted bel
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00419.html (11,764 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu