Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls@3n.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] international--OT (score: 1): Author: "John, W3ULS" <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:10:15 -0400; Rick has hit on a particular beef of mine. For a brief time in the 90s, I was in charge of a banking industry group looking into consumer payments in the U.S. A number of things were clear, including; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00241.html (8,040 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Argosy 525 Query (score: 1): Author: "John, W3ULS" <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:49:10 -0500; I've added the #220 SSB filter in the Argosy 525. The manual says to realign the carrier oscillator. What adverse effects will occur if the oscillator is NOT realigned? (Probably would require a trip; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00364.html (7,099 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Argosy Query (score: 1): Author: "John, W3ULS" <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:41:34 -0500; 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00383.html (6,512 bytes)
4. [TenTec] 6M with HF - WAS: ARRL (score: 1): Author: "John, W3ULS" <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:44:50 -0500; Doug Smith's Kachina?; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00384.html (6,502 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Code and everything else (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:14:09 -0800; My two cents: 1. On this one, ARRL did all it could. Joel Hallas' post pretty much says it all. 2. I'm glad W8JI was successful well before now in his quest for manufacturers to clean up their key cl; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00355.html (9,453 bytes)
6. [TenTec] New OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:48:11 -0700; Someone at Ten-Tec gets it, from this old gent's point of view: Optional Model 302R remote encoder/keypad works with the OMNI-VII. Plug it in and control selected features sitting back in your easy c; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00181.html (7,696 bytes)
7. [TenTec] ORION II--Tech Topics (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:01:31 -0700; Per Jim Lowman, I suggest this is the very kind of thread/comment best reserved for the Yahoo Orion group. Some of us do not own, and will not own, an Orion, and placing Orion stuff on its own site w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00354.html (7,094 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Argosy I "Thump" (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:58:33 -0700; I'm a little late coming to this subject, but QST ran a fix in its "Hints and Kinks" for the AGC "pop" problem back in 1982 or l983. Someone may have more info on this. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00485.html (8,068 bytes)
9. [TenTec] "Being a Contrarian . . ." (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:31:16 -0400; Last evening I looked up the QST review of the ORION II and found something of note from a contrarian's point of view: The close-in receive specs for the "subreceiver" are in the 70 dB range. As I un; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00809.html (8,563 bytes)
10. [TenTec] K3NA transmit audio chain article now on Ten-Tec website (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:10:45 -0400; This is an excellent omen--focusing on SSB transmit issues. W8JI has been campaigning for years against the prevalence of poor phone signals on the han bands. The more information made available of a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00127.html (8,224 bytes)
11. [TenTec] ORION II Finals: Are they Robust? (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:22:53 -0800; I think it's generally acknowledged that the finals in the OMNI VIs will withstand high SWRs without falling back on output. I'm wondering if the same can be said for the ORION II's? I can use a Caro; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00020.html (7,491 bytes)
12. [TenTec] "Sounds Sweet" (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:17:52 -0500; My two cents: I use both the "Sounds Sweet" and the T-T $90.00 speaker. Both are excellent communications speakers. I also have an Icom SP-20, which ain't bad either, and it has dual inputs, on/off,; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00751.html (9,341 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Orion II Reviews (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:00:00 -0800; Dave: If you really want scarcity, look at the (very few) reviews of the new Yaesu FTdx9000. I don't understand why there's such a scarcity because the radio's been out for a while now and it's radic; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00079.html (7,914 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Jupiter II, anybody? (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:39:49 -0800; My two cents: I just bought a Jupiter I. My sense is that it meets the needs of most hams as is. It does not have a "brick wall" front end, etc., but it is extremely well designed. With the outboard; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01292.html (7,091 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Forget Orion . . . (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:10:13 -0500; William: Congratulations on your purchase. You are joining a long list of people who like the Argo V. In fact, is there anyone out there who doesn't? I would be using one except for the 20-watt outpu; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00461.html (7,149 bytes)
16. [TenTec] ARRL FTdx9000 ETR (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:13:29 -0800; Bob: I think a lot of hams actually use rigs before deciding which ones they prefer. I am not in the category of John, W5GI, who has run through over 1,000, but I have used a bunch in the past four y; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00247.html (7,767 bytes)
17. [TenTec] What's going on with the O2? (score: 1): Author: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:03:23 -0700; My two cents: 1. I've heard that the scope/display in the new FT-9000DX is nothing to write home about. The IC-7800 supposedly has a greatly superior visual display. I guess the Orion II will be comp; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00269.html (10,207 bytes)
18. [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT-9000 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:27:08 -0400; I wouldn't be so hard on the QST reviewers. I think a careful reading of all of the comments provide a pretty good sense of the 9000's performance, ditto the Orion review of some months back. I was p; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00162.html (8,212 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Managing the list (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:08:07 -0400; "I am about 30 seconds from removing myself from this list as it doesn't seem to have all that much to offer those of us that use other Ten-Tec gear and are looking for ways to use it better. KG6TT"; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00015.html (6,942 bytes)
20. [TenTec] OT: Lightning and Grounds (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:13:35 -0400; "George, I do hope you have those driven grounds bonded to the AC mains ground and all other driven grounds around the property. Failure to do so will produce a step voltage between two different gro; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00757.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]