Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls@3n.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] CW Contests and IP3 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:58:08 -0500; The ARRL lab's IP3 data for the Argonaut V and the Yaesu FT-920 show the latter's IP3 superior by a wide margin. Yet listening on several CW contest weekends yielded the finding that the Argonaut rec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00271.html (7,749 bytes)
122. [TenTec] CW Contests and IP3 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 09:33:10 -0500; Hello, Barry: Many thanks for your posting. It raises an intriguing question--not for that particular FT-920 since I've just sold it--but about the FT-920 generally. I never considered the possibilit; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00276.html (9,194 bytes)
123. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 08:06:47 -0500; Given the variables involved in lab data results and their interpretation, as discussed in this thread, there seems to be no substitute for in-home evaluations of transceiver performance by each ham; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00353.html (11,914 bytes)
124. [TenTec] Sample-to-Sample Variations (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:02:58 -0500; "Alas, to my knowledge, no one doing testing looks at more than a sample of one. The ARRL Lab ends up spending about 20-30 test hours on a major rig and it really isn't possible to do complete testin; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00537.html (9,272 bytes)
125. [TenTec] Argo V--first impressions (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:44:38 -0500; Hello: I received from Ten-Tec yesterday a new (demo) Argonaut V with TCXO, which I got primarily for CW. Not surprisingly, the QSK is excellent and sooo quiet. What came as a pleasant surprise is th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00370.html (9,177 bytes)
126. [TenTec] Further re new Argo V (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:24:48 -0500; My first three CW contacts with the new Argonaut V have turned out to be LW2DX, 3B8CF, and HR5/F2JD. This rig keeps on surprising me. If Ron is correct about the front end holding up, I may well be s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00448.html (7,212 bytes)
127. [TenTec] Another further re new Argo V (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:27:32 -0500; Christopher et al: I've not experienced the problems you describe . . . I leave my Argo on all the time. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00479.html (6,897 bytes)
128. [TenTec] WriteLog & Argonaut V (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:58:58 -0500; Ron, K5DJ, the WriteLog guru, tells me he's planning to include support for the Argonaut V in his WriteLog program asap. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00487.html (7,343 bytes)
129. [TenTec] Argo V Continues to Amaze (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:14:42 -0500; In last weekend's ARRL CW DX contest, the Argonaut V I just bought held up amazingly well amid the strong signals. In fact, the comparison rig--a Yaesu Mark V with 500/400 Hz (Yaesu/Inrad) filters--p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00778.html (7,074 bytes)
130. [TenTec] CQ Review of Argo V (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:26:14 -0500; Readers of CQ Magazine will find an excellent review of the Argonaut V in the March issue. Very thorough and balanced. Does not have lab data, of course. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00928.html (6,654 bytes)
131. [TenTec] I get nervous when . . . (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:15:49 -0500; It looks like the first Orions are just around the corner, and I get nervous when I think that the rig's reputation will to a considerable extent stand or fall on what the ARRL's lab reports. Since t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00220.html (8,651 bytes)
132. [TenTec] Sevierville Confab (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:57:18 -0500; If Ten-Tec would set aside a spot at its fall fest for participants in this reflector to gather face-to-face, it would in and of itself be worth the journey to East Tennessee for the experience, IMHO; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00386.html (6,815 bytes)
133. [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:36:13 -0500; Hello, folks: To reiterate a point I made in an earlier posting, not only are receive figures important, but so are transmit figures. Many recent rigs have unacceptable two-tone 3d order IMD numbers; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00130.html (8,686 bytes)
134. [TenTec] Argonaut Review (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:46:09 -0400; I agree with Caitlyn that a first impression posted on eHam.net is not a definitive review. On the other hand, first impressions are important, because radios not only are measurable objectively with; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00459.html (7,746 bytes)
135. [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:04:41 -0500; While devoting considerable resources to receiver design to provide reasonable clarity and selectivity, manufacturers of ham radios seem to slight the transmit function. Some rigs marketed today may; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00621.html (8,330 bytes)
136. [TenTec] Models 563 & 564 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:02:57 -0400; If I am not mistaken, there are some differences in the OMNI VI models depending on when they were built. At some point, in order to rein in costs, Ten-Tec went to a less expensive VFO/decoder on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00319.html (6,837 bytes)
137. [TenTec] Argosy question (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:42:56 -0400; I've fired up my Argosy 525. I would like to know where I can find info on the fix for the audio-derived AGC "pop" heard on strong CW sigs. Thanks. John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00437.html (6,478 bytes)
138. [TenTec] Orion ETA (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:42:06 -0400; IMHO, it is much more important that the first Orions, when shipped, meet their specs and have no notable QC problems, rather than meet an arbitrary "ship by" date. Since the Orion is pricey, skeptic; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00434.html (6,687 bytes)
139. [TenTec] Orion's Pricing (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:45:01 -0400; The price of top-end Japanese-made radios has jumped $100-$200 and more in the past few days, no doubt reflecting the fact that the yen has risen 12% against the dollar since February and suggesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00134.html (6,974 bytes)
140. [TenTec] IC-746PRO Review (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 13:21:03 -0500; Fellow Ten-Tec owners: If you want to read an outstanding example of how to turn an ordinary radio into a winner see Rick Lindquist's review for the May issue of QST of the IC-746PRO. It is posted on; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00160.html (7,035 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]