Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls@3n.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Follow up (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:07:38 -0400; The OMNI VI is shining in WAE CW. Only problem is, there isn't much variety in the Euro contest stations--mostly Germans (at least what I can hear with antennas at half mast due to Charley). No need; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00657.html (7,068 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Alas, not for me (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:22:59 -0400; If, as has been speculated, Ten-Tec may come out with a successor to the Pegasus, there's no doubt that such a product would be able to do all kinds of neat digital things. One example of where thing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01182.html (7,762 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Elmer Question (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:41:42 -0400; Can someone tell me what their experience has been with the Orion as compared to the OMNI VI (or VI+) in day-to-day operating? Over the weekend there was a QRP event, and around here there were lots; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00085.html (7,347 bytes)
44. [TenTec] Elmer Question--TNX (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:54:03 -0400; Thanks to all who answered. Very useful comments. QRN has been much more of a nuisance/problem at my QTH than QRM since day one, and I'm always on the lookout for ways to minimize that kind of noise.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00112.html (6,777 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter Better? (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 19:25:42 -0400; Re: firmware updates. A Ten-Tec rep told me some time ago that the Argonaut is a finished product and no further updates will be forthcoming. I don't know whether this injunction applies to the Jupit; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00173.html (10,010 bytes)
46. [TenTec] Let's Talk Furniture (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:39:46 -0400; I use a 36" X 36" Anthro Cart with two shelves (requires extender poles). Anthro stuff is built like a tank and has robust casters, making the big unit (not Randy Johnson) very convenient. If you're; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00024.html (6,858 bytes)
47. [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:30:16 -0400; Reading the exchanges between Sinisa and Ulrich got me to wondering: My impression of the recent CQ WPX CW contest was that there were a LOT fewer contesters on the air than I had expected. But I am; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00206.html (8,838 bytes)
48. [TenTec] OT:Question for Contesters (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:20:17 -0400; Thanks for the responses. I listened/operated mostly on 20, and some on 15. I figured with the poorer propagation on 10 and 15 that 20 would be as raucous as a coal town boardinghouse. Not so. There; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00248.html (7,836 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:33:12 -0400; I've owned two Mark V's. Kept them a total of 18 months, and sold them. I did not like the way the analog filters were arranged, and they were pricey as well. The existence of audio-level DSP seemed; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00746.html (8,209 bytes)
50. [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:58:51 -0400; IMHO the quality of the text article accompanying the ARRL's lab findings in the QST reviews is highly dependent on the author of the text, rather than the result of any editorial bias. For example,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00827.html (10,092 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Re: New Yaesu $10 K HF (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 14:43:48 -0400; AC5E wrote that the Hallicrafters S-38 was an optimal easy-to-use, operator-friendly rig. My experience with an S-40B was similar, and it was attractive in appearance as well. My vote for a successor; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00453.html (7,377 bytes)
52. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:27:47 -0400; ". . . even on SSB it is fine, no pinched SSB here, sounds very nice to me." Me too. I don't understand why the INRAD audio mod was/is needed. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00107.html (7,627 bytes)
53. [TenTec] RE: OMNI VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:45:40 -0400; ". . .when someone always set the PBT and the Notch "straight up," turned the mike gain to max, and then complained about the audio and the splatter reports he got. FWIW, the very worst offenders wer; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00125.html (7,576 bytes)
54. [TenTec] Virginians Have Brainpower Too! (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:31:42 -0400; I'm gratified to see favorable references to RadioWorks' products & tips on this reflector, since Jim Thompson's QTH is Virginia Beach. Goes to show you not all the brainpower's in Tennessee! 73, Joh; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00387.html (6,720 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Anti-BPL Campaign (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:56:57 -0400; I'm afraid the last-ditch effort to derail the Bush campaign's promises regarding broadband services via BPL will be of no avail. By now, it seems obvious that FCC Chairman Powell got the bright idea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00597.html (8,560 bytes)
56. [TenTec] Omni VI+ & VI/3 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:03:30 -0500; A good description of the differences is a post of 9/11/02 by David Hammond. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00236.html (6,642 bytes)
57. [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:19:02 -0500; The trouble with eHam.net, and it's not new, is that the web site does not recognize subscribers. I send in dough at least once a year, but I still have had to zap the subscription plea that pops up; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00327.html (8,614 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Argonaut V's Glossary (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:26:35 -0500; As I read the many postings regarding problems/quirks of the Orion, I am reminded of how trouble-free and well-designed is the Argonaut V. It is an excellent entry-level HF rig, as well as one that p; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00587.html (8,936 bytes)
59. [TenTec] Will Orion be Ten-Tec's Last? (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:16:49 -0500; When a company loses its brainiest employee (Doug Smith), it's time for black crepe, it seems to me, rather than sentiments such as he won't be missed because his work was done. One thing Smith's dep; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00290.html (9,908 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Hanging Black Crepe (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:39:14 -0500; From Scott Robbins: "John: I know you didn't mean it the way it sounded - - - " Apparently my "black crepe" reference was read by some to mean a funeral is looming for Ten-Tec. What I said about the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00331.html (8,509 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]