Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls@3n.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:47:05 -0500; Hello, Dave: Re your comment on the T-T reflector, how do your OMNI VI and the Jupiter stack up? I have an OMNI VI, which is as you know a very good all-around CW rig. Does the Jupiter add value? 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00724.html (8,677 bytes)
62. [TenTec] Transceivers in ARRL CW Contest (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:12:46 -0500; I tried out several transceivers over the course of the ARRL CW DX contest this weekend. My ranking, in terms of dealing with (1) the multitude of very strong signals and (2) ease of use (digging out; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00728.html (7,730 bytes)
63. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:48:19 -0500; Thank you, Mark, et al: Based on what I've heard, there seems little, if anything, to be gained by moving from the OMNI VI to a Jupiter, and some advantage to keeping the old rig. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00733.html (8,297 bytes)
64. [TenTec] Jupiter vs IC-746PRO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:06:05 -0500; Thanks, Rick and Mark and Steve: I should have mentioned I am a retro guy who likes CW most of all, prefers simplicity in controls, etc., and regards computers as a necessary evil. However, I do enjo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00741.html (7,790 bytes)
65. [TenTec] One pretty radio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:59:56 -0500; "There are much prettier radios than ORION, and though I am a charter member of the Cult, I really hate the color of the cabinet and panel! " You do not have to look far for something better: the Arg; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00777.html (6,791 bytes)
66. [TenTec] OMNI VI INRAD Audio Mod (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:11:59 -0500; I guess that I'm in a small minority, but I find the audio from my OMNI VI (Opt. 3) c. 1994 to be excellent through an ICOM SP-20 speaker. Crisp, clear communications quality. No mod needed. The over; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00779.html (7,048 bytes)
67. [TenTec] Built-in keyers (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:05:30 -0500; . . . Now if the vendors would build something in like the LogiKeyer -- that would be a different story ... Well, my TS-870S has a built-in K-1 LogiKey(er). Works great, very convenient. Unfortunatel; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00879.html (6,863 bytes)
68. [TenTec] Orion and phase noise (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:42:22 -0500; The ARRL lab has found the Orion's transmitted phase noise to be the lowest of any rig ever tested there. It's -140 db/Hz from the get-go. If I read the ARRL Handbook correctly (2004 edition), transm; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00173.html (8,921 bytes)
69. [TenTec] PS grounding (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:57:26 -0500; The #961 PS I use with an OMNI VI has a ground lug. The switching PS that comes with the IC-746PRO, and an Astron switcher I own do not. Why the ground lug on the 961? Is it a case of belt-and-suspen; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00298.html (7,850 bytes)
70. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:37:20 -0500; It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measurements at 20 kHz; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00365.html (8,041 bytes)
71. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:00:11 -0500; Terry's table is very useful. Another take on the same data can be found at: http://www.ringstad-radio.com/comparing_rigs.pdf Unfortunately, the RSGB data is not directly comparable to the ARRL's lab; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00393.html (7,929 bytes)
72. [TenTec] Thanks, Mike (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:05:01 -0500; The bad news (much less important) is that I will be out of the office tomorrow through all next week, so any questions or comments you would like to send my way won't get replied to until the 22nd.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00397.html (7,038 bytes)
73. [TenTec] ORION---K2 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:15:06 -0500; Let's not forget that you have to build the K2 and that it's a bit cumbersome to operate, and the ORION, for all its greatness, is simply EXPENSIVE. 73 Rick By my accounting, when you add up the K2 o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00506.html (7,356 bytes)
74. [TenTec] RadCom Jupiter Review (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:25:24 -0500; "The above advert is placed just after the Jupiter review.. Peter Hart liked it. Cheers! Paul MW0CDO." Does anyone know how to get hold of a copy of the Peter Hart/RadCom review of the Jupiter (w/o s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00507.html (6,698 bytes)
75. [TenTec] Orion freezing (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:12:31 -0500; Check issues such as use of poor noisy power supply, inadequate power leads. Leads from supply to rig not twisted pair, etc. Make sure connectors are tight, lugs on power supply are tight etc. -Stuar; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00610.html (7,694 bytes)
76. [TenTec] Orion Freezing (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03:19 -0500; John, The 961 and 962 don't really handle enough current to run the ORION (to full power). You need 24A for an ORION and the two older units cut off at 20A. 73 Rick Rick: Thanks for the info. I was w; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00642.html (7,980 bytes)
77. [TenTec] 1.367 Orion Update (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:27:29 -0500; I see that one of the changes in the new update has to do with the operation of RIT/XIT. Next I'd like to see Ten-Tec improve the operation of RIT/XIT on the Argonaut V per previous comments in a new; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00870.html (7,003 bytes)
78. RE: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 08:34:26 -0500; Yes, Rick, so it seems from the photos that appear on contesting.com. But . . . I was privileged to sit next to K1SE at K4JA's QTH some time ago during a CW contest and I listened with a second set o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01082.html (7,872 bytes)
79. [TenTec] SCAF-1 Filter (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:32:18 -0500; I've just started using a Logikey SCAF-1 filter with my OMNI VI. I must say it is pleasant to use (CW only at this point) and cuts way down on atmospheric noise--in this regard, it is superior to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00184.html (6,993 bytes)
80. [TenTec] Choice of Rigs for Contests (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:44:38 -0500; I can imagine a bunch of reasons why most "big guns" use FT-1000MPs, which admittedly will be eligible for display at the Smithsonian as museum artifacts before long. And the main reason has nothing; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00442.html (9,293 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]