Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls@3n.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Bavarian CC's Orion Review--Clarification (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:53:10 -0500
Rick Westerman, DJ0IP, one of the authors of the Bavarian CC's review of the Orion, sent me an e-mail, the pertinent parts of which follow: "Please allow me to state that the rig used for the test wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00724.html (7,231 bytes)

82. [TenTec] Waiting for Transceiver Nirvana (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:18:05 -0500
While waiting for zero hour of the CQ WW CW contest, these thoughts occur on the recent postings re software-driven base station rigs. 1. They are (with the odd exception of the IC-746PRO) damnably e
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00767.html (8,269 bytes)

83. [TenTec] Transceiver Nirvana/Transceiver Pricing (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:36:05 -0500
Duane G. wrote: No matter how you slice it all ham radio gear today is less expensive in inflation-adjusted real terms than they have ever been at any time in history of ham radio, - for any level of
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00781.html (8,325 bytes)

84. [TenTec] Transceiver Nirvana--cont'd. (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:56:17 -0500
My prediction: within 3 years, you'll be able to purchase a QRP transceiver in the above configuration for under $200. 73, Dave, AA6YQ You can buy a 1w HF SDR now for $499.95. I'm thinking of picking
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00795.html (7,834 bytes)

85. [TenTec] Orion and phase noise (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:42:22 -0500
The ARRL lab has found the Orion's transmitted phase noise to be the lowest of any rig ever tested there. It's -140 db/Hz from the get-go. If I read the ARRL Handbook correctly (2004 edition), transm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00174.html (7,721 bytes)

86. [TenTec] PS grounding (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:57:26 -0500
The #961 PS I use with an OMNI VI has a ground lug. The switching PS that comes with the IC-746PRO, and an Astron switcher I own do not. Why the ground lug on the 961? Is it a case of belt-and-suspen
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00299.html (7,020 bytes)

87. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:37:20 -0500
It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measurements at 20 kHz
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00366.html (7,166 bytes)

88. [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:00:11 -0500
Terry's table is very useful. Another take on the same data can be found at: http://www.ringstad-radio.com/comparing_rigs.pdf Unfortunately, the RSGB data is not directly comparable to the ARRL's lab
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00394.html (7,934 bytes)

89. [TenTec] Thanks, Mike (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:05:01 -0500
Mike Tracy wrote: The bad news (much less important) is that I will be out of the office tomorrow through all next week, so any questions or comments you would like to send my way won't get replied t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00398.html (7,031 bytes)

90. [TenTec] ORION---K2 (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:15:06 -0500
Let's not forget that you have to build the K2 and that it's a bit cumbersome to operate, and the ORION, for all its greatness, is simply EXPENSIVE. 73 Rick By my accounting, when you add up the K2 o
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00507.html (7,107 bytes)

91. [TenTec] RadCom Jupiter Review (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:25:24 -0500
"The above advert is placed just after the Jupiter review.. Peter Hart liked it. Cheers! Paul MW0CDO." Does anyone know how to get hold of a copy of the Peter Hart/RadCom review of the Jupiter (w/o s
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00508.html (6,552 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Orion freezing (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:12:31 -0500
Check issues such as use of poor noisy power supply, inadequate power leads. Leads from supply to rig not twisted pair, etc. Make sure connectors are tight, lugs on power supply are tight etc. -Stuar
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00611.html (7,103 bytes)

93. [TenTec] Orion Freezing (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03:19 -0500
John, The 961 and 962 don't really handle enough current to run the ORION (to full power). You need 24A for an ORION and the two older units cut off at 20A. 73 Rick Rick: Thanks for the info. I was w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00643.html (7,430 bytes)

94. [TenTec] 1.367 Orion Update (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:27:29 -0500
I see that one of the changes in the new update has to do with the operation of RIT/XIT. Next I'd like to see Ten-Tec improve the operation of RIT/XIT on the Argonaut V per previous comments in a new
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00871.html (6,615 bytes)

95. RE: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 08:34:26 -0500
Yes, Rick, so it seems from the photos that appear on contesting.com. But . . . I was privileged to sit next to K1SE at K4JA's QTH some time ago during a CW contest and I listened with a second set o
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01083.html (7,473 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Will Orion be Ten-Tec's Last? (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:16:49 -0500
When a company loses its brainiest employee (Doug Smith), it's time for black crepe, it seems to me, rather than sentiments such as he won't be missed because his work was done. One thing Smith's dep
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00290.html (8,787 bytes)

97. [TenTec] Hanging Black Crepe (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:39:14 -0500
From Scott Robbins: "John: I know you didn't mean it the way it sounded - - - " Apparently my "black crepe" reference was read by some to mean a funeral is looming for Ten-Tec. What I said about the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00331.html (7,842 bytes)

98. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:47:05 -0500
Hello, Dave: Re your comment on the T-T reflector, how do your OMNI VI and the Jupiter stack up? I have an OMNI VI, which is as you know a very good all-around CW rig. Does the Jupiter add value? 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00724.html (8,188 bytes)

99. [TenTec] Transceivers in ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:12:46 -0500
I tried out several transceivers over the course of the ARRL CW DX contest this weekend. My ranking, in terms of dealing with (1) the multitude of very strong signals and (2) ease of use (digging out
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00728.html (7,451 bytes)

100. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:48:19 -0500
Thank you, Mark, et al: Based on what I've heard, there seems little, if anything, to be gained by moving from the OMNI VI to a Jupiter, and some advantage to keeping the old rig. 73, John, W3ULS ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00733.html (7,951 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu