Mail Archive Search: <+from:w3uls73@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w3uls73@gmail.com: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The ideal transceiver (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 09:40:44 -0400; Craig has the right idea (K3 vs Orion, etc.). Of course, much in defining the "ideal" transceiver depends on one's operating preferences. My first criterion is price. My second criterion is ergonomic; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00092.html (7,477 bytes)
2. [TenTec] IC-7700 (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:12:29 -0400; Icom at Dayton has unveiled the IC-7700 with no price yet, but likely in the $6,000 range. In other words, the same performance as the OMNI VII at twice the price. I'd say the K3 will be more of a co; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00250.html (6,919 bytes)
3. [TenTec] FS: Jupiter (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:55:06 -0400; Ten-Tec Jupiter, in top condition. Bought new from Ten-Tec 12/05. Includes hand mike, matching Ten-Tec speaker (charcoal), manual, power cord and #302 remote pod (tan color). (Does not have optional; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00489.html (6,624 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:58:52 -0400; I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the OMNI VII. It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I would have thought there would be discussion of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00337.html (7,372 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI VII--Thanks (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:37:44 -0400; Tnx for the replies to my musing. I find the stuff the OMNI VII can do, as illustrated by Paul, W9AC's excellent explanation, bewildering. I came from a job where other people handled computers and a; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00352.html (7,946 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Off Topic, sort of (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:34:20 -0400; I'm wondering if others have found the photo of Elecraft's forthcoming K-3 to reveal an ugly radio? Is the color really some sort of tepid yellow/brown with what appear to be parts bin front panel co; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00298.html (7,178 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Off Topic, sort of (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:29:04 -0400; "I would not make too many comments about a rig you have not seen." Art, it's the photo I've seen and the photo alone was the subject of my post. If the rig looks better in the flesh than in its phot; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00315.html (7,611 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Argosy I Price (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:29:29 -0400; I, too, have a beloved Argosy I, only this one is in top condition, with Shure mike, Ten-Tec power supply and antenna tuner.We're moving, and I do not have room for it in the new digs. T'was me first; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00365.html (6,500 bytes)
9. [TenTec] More ARRL Lab Data (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:51:08 -0400; The October review of the FT-2000D in QST, now posted, contains an article by Mike Tracy outlining further refinements in the Lab's testing regimen. Oh, brother, he's leaving me behind. What comes th; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00242.html (7,214 bytes)
10. [TenTec] More ARRL Lab Data (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:48:06 -0400; Thanks, Carl. I see that recent firmware updates for the O II included changes in AGC action. Sherwood ought to take note of these firmware adjustments, don't you think? 73, John, W3ULS _____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00250.html (7,178 bytes)
11. [TenTec] dual receive (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:02:34 -0400; Carl, et al: Re the RX-320 as a second receiver, my impression is that it's a pretty primitive receiver and would not hold up in pileups, etc. Am I wrong? 73, John, W3ULS ____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00084.html (7,204 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Receive Audio Mod INRAD (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:43:41 -0400; For reasons no doubt due to higher-quality parts used in Ten-Tec's production early on, my very early OMNI VI (opt. 3), purchased second-hand, has very good (dare I say excellent?) communications-qua; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00405.html (6,971 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Receive Audio Mod INRAD (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:23:07 -0400; Hi, Barry: "for those looking for wider receive audio bandwidth, there's just no comparison between the Omni6 (ARRL measured 1630hz bandwidth) and the FT-1000MP (capable of ~ 3000hz bandwidth in EDSP; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00438.html (7,753 bytes)
14. [TenTec] OMNI VI BDR (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:42:46 -0400; Can anyone tell me what close-in BDR is for the OMNI VI? Tnx es 73, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00557.html (6,542 bytes)
15. [TenTec] FS: OMNI VI (Opt. 3) (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:18:09 -0500; For Sale: Ten-Tec OMNI VI (Opt. 3). Factory upgrade to performance of OMNI VI Plus. Model #563. Ser. # 2A10142. Excellent condition. 2d owner. Includes: factory 2d order IMD mod; TCXO (installed 2002; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00164.html (7,226 bytes)
16. [TenTec] FS: T-T 937 Power Supply (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:08:51 -0500; The 937 Power supply is made for the Argonaut V. 7 amp continuous. Linear. E-mail with offer <W3ULS73@gmail.com> es tnx. 73, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00234.html (6,733 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Time Sharing Radio Access? (score: 1): Author: "John Rippey" <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:27:01 -0500; For most of the past year I have not had access to an HF rig due to having moved into a condo apartment in Wash DC. It is a 1950s vintage building and its concrete/rebar construction effectively elim; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00151.html (8,479 bytes)
18. [TenTec] "not" (score: 1): Author: "John Rippey" <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:29:41 -0500; Last sentence in my post should have a "not" as in not much. John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00152.html (6,701 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Time Sharing, etc. (score: 1): Author: "John Rippey" <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:48:49 -0500; Thanks to all for constructive ideas. My goal is not to have to walk more than a few feet to have access, meaning that the idea of a club's setting up something at a remote location doesn't work. It; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00167.html (7,536 bytes)
20. [TenTec] #225 PS (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:52:02 -0400; I'm using a #225 PS temporarily to power an OMNI VI (receive only). The cover of this 10 amp unit gets really hot over the transformer. Not having used the PS for years, I can't figure whether it's a; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00107.html (6,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]