- 1. Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future (score: 1)
- Author: Art Roberts - W5AER <w5aer@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:45:42 +0000
- Bob, I am about a year behind you and feel very much like you and many of the others here. I like a radio that I can put my fingers on and feel like I am "in control". I have used my computer with a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00052.html (14,962 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers (score: 1)
- Author: Art Roberts - W5AER <w5aer@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 22:12:49 +0000
- You are right, no one needs a panadapter, but it can be handy.. My only use of one was in the mid 60's, on 2 meter AM. I had a Heathkit panadaptor attached to my converter-receiver setup. In those da
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00171.html (11,586 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers (score: 1)
- Author: Art Roberts - W5AER <w5aer@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 04:55:08 +0000
- Steve, Back then, I started with a Twoer too, but added the converter/receiver and just transmitted with the Twoer. The Twoer's had very good audio punch, for a low power rig. I was at Westover AFB,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-11/msg00179.html (10,861 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] COST OF OWNERSHIP (COO) (score: 1)
- Author: Art Roberts - W5AER <w5aer@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:26:33 -0500
- Thanks Rick for some great info. A very good way to look at things. I can relate to getting older parts. While working for the US Navy, I was trying to find replacement parts for the four older UK mi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2015-01/msg00232.html (10,629 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu