Mail Archive Search: <+from:w5ec@digitalexp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w5ec@digitalexp.com: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] RE: Dual Receive (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:51:32 -0500; This is my response to my own posting. I received about 10 replies to this post and ALL said they use dual receive much of the time. Nobody agreed with me. I still say I will have trouble trying to u; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00301.html (9,003 bytes)
22. [TenTec] 546 Omini-D Squelch Model (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:44:05 -0500; The OMNI D was the first Ten Tec digital xcvr I think. I have serial # 19 which I bought new in 1978. It is a great rig. The OMNI A was the same rig but analog display. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00163.html (7,692 bytes)
23. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 07:29:14 -0600; WOW! I had heard rumors about this secret feature but this is the first time I have seen it published. I'm sure gonna be careful now. Bill To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00023.html (9,693 bytes)
24. [TenTec] omni d info (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:31:48 -0600; I have a real OMNI-D (no versions) which I bought new in 1979 serial # 19. It stills works great and I wouldn' t part with it for anything. I thought I had the original letter describing the new band; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00162.html (8,286 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Why Stop Here ? MFJ Cleartone replacement (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 07:23:26 -0600; snip Ok, lets don't stop here. I have to use headphones to let the xyl sleep while operation. What are the best headphones for cw? I use the good stereo ones too, but there are not great for cw. Bill; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00114.html (8,629 bytes)
26. [TenTec] Lightning crashes (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 20:04:41 -0600; OK, I think I have the earphone thing down pat. What I want to know is what is a good way to eliminate those darn static crashes that threaten to blow out my eardrums. Since the OMNI VI+ is so sensit; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00149.html (6,830 bytes)
27. [TenTec] S Meter Lamps (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:19:11 -0600; The s-meter lamps in my OMNI VI+ flickers (dims) but not off. It does it by itself with me doing nothing and it does not do it all the time. I see no reason. Before I go inside, is the fix described; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00171.html (8,261 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Dual 250 Hz filters--worth it? (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:46:22 -0600; These are the only filters I have. I use them in combination ALL the time plus an external dsp unit. I only chase dx, usually very weak signals with lots of others calling. I remember how bad it was; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00309.html (8,076 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Onmi VI problem (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 19:24:45 -0600; My problem was described below, but after about a week it went away. Ten Tec and one answer I received here said to check the PLL circuit board for cracks. I have not done that yet and will probably; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00140.html (7,818 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Omni VII input (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 09:40:44 -0600; I don't need an OMNI VII! I just upgraded to the VI+ mod. It should be good for 10 to 15 years Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Admi; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00233.html (8,917 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Omni VI Main Tuning Knob (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 08:12:54 -0600; Got mine back a couple of weeks ago (#436). It had a slight resistance (gummy sticky resistance?) at some point during rotation if the dial. Not bad but noticible. It wasn't there before I sent it aw; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00050.html (9,553 bytes)
32. [TenTec] 1st IF filter (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:12:40 -0600; While my VI was being converted to PLUS I had them install the 250Hz 9 MHz filter. Almost all my operating is CW and 99% of that is listening for dx on 80 and 40. I use BOTH 250 Hz filters most of th; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00127.html (8,086 bytes)
33. [TenTec] Onmi VI problem (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 13:44:19 -0600; Here's a new problem I havn't seen here. It is on cw. I have been leaving the power supply on all the time and turning the VI off/on with it's switch.Wednesday morning after being on about 30 minutes; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00197.html (7,393 bytes)
34. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 07:33:18 -0500; Hi all 99% of my operating is cw chasing dx. I always use the 250 Hz 282 filter and I think I want to add a 250Hz 9 MHz 219 filter to give me more selectivity. Does anyone use this combination and ho; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00046.html (7,307 bytes)
35. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 17:27:23 -0500; Hi all, Not much response to my question about the 219 filter. One doesn't like it, one says it is ok but doesn't use it and one likes it. Anybody else use the 250 KHz 9 MHz filter with the 250 KHz 6; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00051.html (7,306 bytes)
36. [TenTec] OMNI VI Filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:16:30 -0500; Hi All My question regarding using 2 250 khz filters didn't draw many positive responses, but I think I still want to try it. Anybody have a spare 219 filter they don't want? Price? Bill W5EC -- FAQ; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00077.html (7,230 bytes)
37. [TenTec] Omni VI Defense (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 11:21:20 -0500; a twirpy sounding ONMI VI probably had some twirpy hands inside it. The internal keyer is good and I used itfor a good while but went back to my old keyer because I could not get quite enough weighti; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00118.html (7,992 bytes)
38. [TenTec] New Cuban Music Video (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 07:21:10 -0500; This is a crock!! Keep it out of my mailbox. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00200.html (8,222 bytes)
39. [TenTec] WTB 219 filter (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 16:14:13 -0500; Hi all I need a 219 filter. If you have one you don't need let me know. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: te; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00215.html (6,545 bytes)
40. [TenTec] FS: : OmniD -- pulling it off the market (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 22:42:01 -0500; When I got my OMNI VI I wouldn't let my OMNI D go either. It is SN 19 and I bought it in 1978. It is in mint condition. I use it periodically to make sure the OMNI VI is working ok. I would get rid o; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-07/msg00053.html (8,240 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]