Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:15:04 -0500
Al, I am sorry that you had to take so much time to attempt to ridicule me on the reflector for asking a sincere technical question . Seems like some folks on here have to play policeman these days t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00541.html (16,438 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:52:15 -0500
Mark, to keep this response to a readable length, let me address only the first of your questions. The "other sideband" and the carrier contribute nothing to the transfer of information from A to B.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00597.html (13,496 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Orion External T/R Switching (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:01:33 -0500
Jim, a triggered sweep scope and a dummy load?
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00808.html (9,381 bytes)

104. RE: [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:40:26 -0600
Scott, take it from one who knows, not all email clients are alike. I use Outlook 2000 which is the big brother to Outlook Express, and regardless of whether you press REPLY TO or REPLY TO ALL, "tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00186.html (14,538 bytes)

105. QRE: [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:13:38 -0600
Mainly, Mike, because every step that you described is done automatically by the computer on most lists when you select the REPLY TO button for a private response. Sure, the process is "simple" but i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00209.html (12,737 bytes)

106. RE: [TenTec] HOWTO: Group replies vs. personal e-mail w/ MS Outlook (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:18:28 -0600
With five manual steps instead of one . . . I'll try it, Paul - thanks. 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE "In the 57t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00245.html (11,075 bytes)

107. RE: [TenTec] How to do it... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:52:59 -0600
Many thanks, Duane - as you can see it works like a hose!
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00247.html (9,904 bytes)

108. [TenTec] Re: ArkieCon (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:09:27 -0600
available bandwidths? Almost but not quite, Max, so let me try to clear up any misunderstanding. The main function of the demo/service that our NETXQRP group will be providing Saturday evening after
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00655.html (9,524 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] Argo V Transmit Audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:11:29 -0600
Excellent, Bob! Your posting is required reading for all SSB operators. Ten Tec could do worse than printing a copy - with your permission, of course - to enclose with each radio they ship. My only d
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00799.html (8,516 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sweep Display Change (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:40:24 -0600
receiver to the other? I mean, it is suppose to be an SDR? At the very least, it takes software to enable that option. Software takes time and costs money. I suspect that this is a feature that may b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00892.html (9,424 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] dealer networks: AES NO value added (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:52:02 -0600
Excellent overview, Keith. I have discussed this situation with the largest dealer in the Dallas area and he puts it this way: The dealer is responsible for delivering to the customer the equipment h
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00116.html (11,906 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] Public Opinion (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:09:27 -0600
Bob, I think that you are beginning to sense the reservations that Adam Farson and I have had for the past year over the ability of Ten Tec to design and produce a product of the performance and comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00178.html (19,889 bytes)

113. [TenTec] Oooops! (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:43:32 -0600
As several others have reported lately, I too have very publicly smeared you know what all over my face by inadvertently sending out to the list an email that was intended solely for the eyes of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00240.html (9,280 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] Whining about the list functions... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 18:02:33 -0600
Now, tell the truth: didn't Mac really write that one? 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better! Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00629.html (8,920 bytes)

115. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:15:54 -0600
I must take credit/blame for the MixW PSK31 macros that John posted. I also have a similar pair of macros that perform the same tasks for CW operation. These can be inferred from the makeup of the PS
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00721.html (11,463 bytes)

116. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:03:15 -0600
Well John, thank Heaven we learn something new every day. Carl N4PY also mentioned that the Ten Tec's use the same command set as the IC-735. One difference that might or might not be important in ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00739.html (10,217 bytes)

117. RE: [TenTec] Johnson PS ?? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:51:49 -0600
Sounds like a linear (non-switching) non-regulated power supply using LC filtering. By non-regulated, I mean that it sounds like it does not use electronic regulation to maintain the output voltage c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00866.html (8,832 bytes)

118. RE: [TenTec] Firmware upgrade Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:47:32 -0600
There may be a slight hitch here in that XP allows a program to be run in a compatibility mode, such as W95, but XP itself cannot, as far as I have found, be configured to operate as if it were simul
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00919.html (9,824 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. Jupiter Audio vs. DSP (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:17:07 -0600
Bob and Jim raise an interesting real-world aspect of A-D conversion. Perhaps a brief overview might be of interest to those encountering these concepts for the first time. Theoretically, an N-bit A/
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00018.html (13,461 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] Orion - cooling fan (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 01:09:52 -0600
"Intermittent commercial and amateur service." Several definitions around for ICAS numerically but it is on the order of 5 minutes on and 20 minutes off, for example. The important point is that it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00086.html (8,932 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu