Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] I get nervous when . . . (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:05:11 -0600
I agree with Barry, as usual. All manner of internal problems can be masked by the introduction of sufficient external noise . . . A receiver with antenna disconnected or terminated in the specified
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00256.html (10,297 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] I get nervous when . . . (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:31:23 -0600
So, how meaningful are the ARRL test results if they come from a cherry-picked, specially prepared, non-production unit? I agree that it is in TT's interest to have ARRL test the best performing "sam
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00257.html (11,256 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Truth in Lending!! (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:39:28 -0600
I mention the total ORION package price as what it will cost a new Ten Tec customer to acquire the ORION "system." Surely you don't expect the ORION market to consist only of previous Ten Tec custome
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00317.html (14,451 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Re Microphones--one more thing (long) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:07:17 -0600
And let's keep in mind that the IF DSP rigs like the PRO and PRO2 do NOT have a carrier balance or insertion frequency adjustment. The SSB signal is generated as a mathematically perfect signal in th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00373.html (10,305 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Black Centurion----Black is Bad in Sevierville!!! (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:54:06 -0600
Believe it . . . maybe not too much but usually a little more, depending upon the nature of the paint, surface prep, and method of application. And whether it is a flat black or textured in some way,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00479.html (10,139 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] [OT] Metal Roof as Ground Plane (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:51:18 -0600
Adding to Duane's warning note, even if you use radials, etc.some return current is still going to flow in the sheets of metal. And, even if you use something like the R-7000 that doesn't require a "
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00498.html (12,652 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] TT and staying on freq (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:48:55 -0600
Use the PRO2 as a reference frequency source to determine the dial-frequency error of the Corsair. If you can make any sort of mechanical or electrical adjustment, perhaps on a band basis, then perha
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00532.html (9,127 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Perspective on RX-340, Collins R390A and Halli. SX-28 (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:59:16 -0600
Tim, I qualify for the historical perspective part since I started in 1945 with a Hallicrafter's S-20R and have used or owned just about everything you mentioned plus a lot more. It would take more t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00541.html (10,595 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Be Careful Updating (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:08:26 -0600
Since the Jupiter is per Ten Tec a "software defined radio" why cannot they merely send you a diskette or CD or download a file containing the original firmware for your Jupiter? The exact firmware c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00585.html (13,223 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Be Careful Updating (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 22:52:11 -0600
Ken, if I recall correctly, the technical term for that situation is "Ooops!" Is there any internal diagnostic that will run that would reset the comm port? Or is the internal computer completely dis
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00589.html (8,956 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Orion, NRD-545, DSP, filters etc (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:42:50 -0600
Let me chime in on this one and agree with Harry, since I have been investigating cw keying for some time now and have evaluated the PRO, the PRO 2, the IC-765 and the K2 in some detail. The problem
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00613.html (13,365 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Orion, NRD-545, DSP, filters etc (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:40:33 -0600
So George, to try and sum up what your saying, the Pro II is 'the very best radio ever produced' as long as you ONLY use it on SSB? Otherwise, after you spend a couple of thousand dollars to purchase
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00629.html (10,190 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Claimed Data: Orion vs. Others (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:16:44 -0600
Main receiver for one and sub-receiver for the other? 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better! Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00631.html (7,964 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus S-Meter Anomaly (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:20:14 -0600
Jerry, the Kachina 505DSP used a similar combination AGC arrangement and provided a separate control for adjusting the degree of AGC control in the front end, etc. 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR -
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00653.html (9,635 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter SWR, and VSWR generally (now longer!) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:57:54 -0600
Well, let me ring back in with a point or two. Pete and I are on the same page, but I think we are pronouncing some of the words differently! <:} First, if you are measuring SWR with an accurate mete
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00663.html (15,322 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] SWR, and meters (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:08:29 -0600
Interesting posting with good info, Jerry - thanks. As I tried to make clear, my points were based upon assumption that the SWR instrument truly measured SWR correctly and that is was not being influ
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00669.html (10,926 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Help with RFI problem, Thanks to all (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 11:26:36 -0600
Just a caution that some monitors may have problems with the higher refresh rates. Good idea to verify with the monitor specs that the combination of resolution and refresh rate is acceptable. 73/72,
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00187.html (8,163 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 07:10:50 -0600
Although my experience with my new PRO2 is limited to a few weeks, its front-end performance compared with the original PRO has been greatly improved. I cannot recall ever having to use attenuation w
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00476.html (9,956 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Argo V on PSK (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:58:58 -0600
With the PSK31 signal in IDLE, it is a two-tone which has a peak to average power ratio of 2:1. So, your output will show 10 watts in idle - when not sending any characters from the keyboard - while
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00051.html (9,832 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 22:35:42 -0600
Pete, take a look at the Sept/Oct. issue of QEX for an article on receiver performance on DX - I think you might be surprised at the overall receiver rankings . . . the heart of the comparisons is th
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00078.html (11,691 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu