Mail Archive Search: <+from:w5yr@att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:40:24 -0600; Sorry to seem so mysterious, guys, about the QEX article . . . Elecraft has placed it on their web site at http://www.elecraft.com I use my K2 as another front end for my Icom PRO by taking an IF sig; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00090.html (10,714 bytes)
142. Re: [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:20:07 -0600; I would expect so, Bob - try it and see. I take an IF signal from the output of the Post-Mixer amplifier where it feeds the noise blanker. Use a 22 pf cap to RG-174 to a BNC in one of the transverter; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00155.html (11,137 bytes)
143. Re: [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:40:20 -0600; Almost any receiver can "front end" another. Points of concern are overloading the second receiver input and impacting the performance of the first receiver by tapping off the signal either at the wr; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00168.html (10,741 bytes)
144. [TenTec] Honey (score: 1): Author: w5yr <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:42:26 -0600; -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/html audio/x-midi application/octet-stream -- StripMime Errors -- A message with no text/plain section was received. The enti; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00187.html (6,465 bytes)
145. [TenTec] Worm Klez.E immunity (score: 1): Author: w5yr <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 05:23:04 -0600; -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/html application/octet-stream application/octet-stream -- StripMime Errors -- A message with no text/plain section was receiv; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00259.html (6,718 bytes)
146. Re: [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:36:40 -0600; I need to dig out the results of some studies I made about a year ago that clearly demonstrated that most of the keying artifacts that we object to result from the manner by which the leading and tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00536.html (16,661 bytes)
147. Re: [TenTec] Key Clicks Made Visible! (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:49:36 -0600; Thanks very much for the URL, Jim - I will give this one a try. 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better! Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00567.html (11,346 bytes)
148. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Microphone? (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 19:43:59 -0500; The two-meter rigs from Icom came with mics in the 70's . . .the Icom IC-730 that I bought in 1982 came with a mic, but the 765 in 1990 did not. However, the IC-756 PRO in 2000 came with a hand mic a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00123.html (9,484 bytes)
149. Re: [TenTec] TWINCOM feedline ????????????? (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:37:14 -0500; Jerry can deal with this at whatever level he chooses, but the short answer is that parallel lines do NOT radiate precisely because they are close enough in terms of wavelength for their equal and op; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00282.html (11,026 bytes)
150. Re: [TenTec] Open Wire (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:24:14 -0500; Let me add another nit or two for the picking: It requires more than just equal dipole halves to make a "truly balanced" system. The environment of each half of the dipole must be the same such that; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00417.html (15,515 bytes)
151. Re: [TenTec] RF in SSB on my Omni VI (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:28:56 -0500; Is the beam directly over your shack roof? Is the tower right next to the house? My initial thought is that you are probably attracting more r-f into the shack equipment with all the attempts at "gro; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00474.html (13,011 bytes)
152. Re: [TenTec] RF in SSB on my Omni VI (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:07:51 -0500; Comment: Steve's idea of monitoring on another receiver is excellent PROVIDED that it is not subject to the same RFI mechanisms as your main rig. If it is not, then that may provide a clue as to your; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00486.html (8,622 bytes)
153. Re: [TenTec] Contest logging (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:37:15 -0500; ARRL CW Sweepstakes contest (CWSS) to be followed by the SSB Sweepstakes contest. 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the 57th year and it just keeps getting better! Fairvi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00516.html (6,970 bytes)
154. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:10:13 -0600; Caity, a question, out of curiosity: Historically, "single-signal reception" has always meant sufficient selectivity that the operator could not hear "the other side of zero beat." This was first ach; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00542.html (10,390 bytes)
155. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:39:14 -0600; Just one remaining point of difference . . . I have found that being able to either bodily move the passband, as in IF Shift, or being able to independently place each slope of the passband, as I can; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00545.html (11,115 bytes)
156. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:11:24 -0600; Gary, does the Corsair have IF filters that are *narrower* than the IF DSP filters in the Pegasus? That is surprising to hear . . . 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00562.html (9,602 bytes)
157. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:19:36 -0600; Very interesting, Gary, and thanks! I have made detailed spectral comparisons between the IF DSP filters in the ICom 756 PRO, the Kachina 505DSP of similar architecture and the Icom 765 with conventi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00567.html (10,180 bytes)
158. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:31:59 -0600; Again, an interesting observation, Gary. Location of the filter(s) *should* have no effect on the overall performance of the IF chain, in fact of the entire receiver, *provided* that the entire syste; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00576.html (15,434 bytes)
159. Re: [TenTec] This IS boring! (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 22:15:26 -0500; Lee, try asking some interesting questions . . . it is a two-way street! <:} 73/72, George Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas In the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00106.html (7,168 bytes)
160. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus Plus observations (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:40:25 -0500; For a year or so I have used the Entrega USB to serial adaptor with no problems. The unit expands the computer USB port to two additional USB ports and four serial ports. I believe the model designat; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00126.html (10,399 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]