Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Re: what is so special about heil microphone elements? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:39:16 -0600
An added effect of impedance mismatching has to do not so much with "power" transfer with mics but with frequency response. The classic D-104 - which I used for many years and still have - sounded gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00870.html (9,445 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Re:BPL (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:32:50 -0500
She is a member of the commission but not the Chairman. Powell is . . . 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE "Starting t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00481.html (7,636 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2/ORION/746PRO (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:18:15 -0500
Good summary and statement of viewpoint, John. Having used an IF DSP radio since I bought the Doug Smith designed Kachina 505 DSP in 1998, and progressing through the Icom 756PRO, PRO2 and now adding
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00075.html (13,235 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Argo Speech Processor Question (was Argo V distortion) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:39:09 -0500
Reed, I suggest that you first check this with a dummy antenna listening on a second receiver. Check all bands. It might be better if you make up a clean tape or .wav file recording of your voice and
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00165.html (12,766 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Argo Speech Processor Question (was Argo V distortion) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:44:20 -0500
You need to set you email client for "word wrap" so it will keep lines short. Well, your tests would seem to eliminate any problem with the rig and your QSO makes it look like at least on 40 that the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00169.html (11,393 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Argo Speech Processor Question (was Argo V distortion) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:06:37 -0500
Looks good, Reed - think you got it set just right. Grounds are most confusing to a lot of guys because there are three of them to be considered: a-c safety ground; "r-f station ground;" and lightnin
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00174.html (14,073 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Argo Speech Processor Question (was Argo V distortion) (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:16:41 -0500
Mainly because of my own experience and that of many others who have agreed with me. See another posting I made a few minutes ago with a little more detail. Getting a genuine connection to Mother Ear
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00175.html (10,805 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:57:08 -0500
John, I am very pleased that your ORION experience has been a good one for you. It is clear that when the ORION is working properly, it is indeed a very good radio with excellent performance. Jim Rei
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00196.html (12,587 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:14:49 -0500
Mark, my experience mirrors yours. I find that I have come to depend almost unconsciously on being able to see what is happening around my tuned frequency. The resolution bandwidth of the Spectrum Sc
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00214.html (11,101 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] GPS and Ten Tec Rigs (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 02:58:26 -0500
John, I don't know much about TT rigs, but modern rigs using PLL arrangements, DDS, etc. etc. rely upon a single frequency standard from which everything else is either derived or slaved to. There ar
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00331.html (11,353 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:19:43 -0500
Used the CIA-HF since 1998 and wouldn't be without it. Only one that plots the data and has an oscillator accurate to within 200 Hz of dial setting and stays put. Currently selling for $600 but worth
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00128.html (9,385 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Re: L net tuners (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:30:49 -0500
Another excellent source of programs for tuner network analysis is http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp/index.html#S102 These programs include analyses for the L, T, and PI networks with provision f
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00141.html (10,248 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:47:28 -0500
Pete, I tend to write off the QST review articles. They must follow different editorial paths than we would like and perhaps expect. However, the ARRL Labs extended test reports are creditable and no
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00152.html (11,097 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 21:12:57 -0500
You know, that happened to me a few months back, Pete, and my name has been mud of this list ever since. Hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube, isn't it? Thanks for the note - I'll respond late
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00159.html (9,486 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Product Reviews II (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:07:02 -0500
John, the keyed waveform spectra for both the 746PRO and the PRO2 show that the keying components are more than 50 dB down at +/- 300 Hz from the carrier frequency. Not bad . . . General agreement wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00185.html (7,786 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 17:21:34 -0500
Pete, you are disappointing me! Every posting you have made lately I agree with 100%! Every radio has warts in design, implementation and ultimate dealer/factory support. I do not believe that any on
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00199.html (15,501 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Corsair ON/OFF (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:06:01 -0500
Jim, Just to stir the pot a little more, it is usually the safest procedure to always turn on the power supply first and let it stabilize before applying the load. Does that apply here? <snip>
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00310.html (9,100 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:59:58 -0500
Stuart, Roy Lewallen rather violently objects to the solenoidal theory. His data prove to the contrary. I believe Roy . . . choke
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00342.html (10,509 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:03:59 -0500
Stuart, I am forwarding you two postings from Roy about baluns. FYI . . . In my testing I have found my bead baluns to cover 80-10 in fine shape with "enough" balun action on 160 to be useful. Six be
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00481.html (11,341 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:52:42 -0500
Thanks for the info, Stuart. The beads I use on my 5-bead baluns are about 1-1/8" long and 1/2" in diameter and will just slip over the insulation of RG-8X. I suspect that the control cable required
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00496.html (10,704 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu