Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 397 ]

Total 397 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Argo V Purchase (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Sat Jul 19 10:31:22 2003
Ron, do you feel that having narrow selectable roofing filters in the Argo V would improve it? How well does the present design deal with multiple S9+30 dB signals "near" your desired S1 signal using
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00564.html (8,002 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Argo V Purchase (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Sun Jul 20 12:41:03 2003
Thanks for the info, Ron, but don't go to any trouble making .wav files. I have a friend with an Argo who would let me audition it if I became interested in getting one. What I was trying to understa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00578.html (10,550 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Argo, Jupiter, Pegasus, RX320 overload (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Mon Jul 21 21:28:56 2003
A resistive attenuator in the antenna input will do about the same. Anything that lowers the front end gain or input signal level will boost the IMDDR3 by the same amount. 73/72, George Amateur Radio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00589.html (9,196 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Argo, Jupiter, Pegasus, RX320 overload (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jul 23 12:03:22 2003
Jack, I wonder if some unintentional typos got into your posting. Adding any loss ahead of the receiver *increases* the noise figure by the amount of the loss in dB and raises the minimum detectable
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00634.html (11,200 bytes)

25. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri Jul 25 19:05:08 2003
I am late getting in on this one, but if the question is how to relate 5 mV of voltage to a power level of -67 dBm, one answer is 125.3 kilohms. <:} I have no idea what the original question was but
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00688.html (9,180 bytes)

26. [TenTec] RE: dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri Jul 25 19:54:42 2003
Pete, I think that you are may be confusing the dBm with the definition of the decibel and how meters are calibrated and referenced.. It is always true, by definition, that 0 dBm represents a power l
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00689.html (9,149 bytes)

27. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri Jul 25 21:17:23 2003
Mark, I think that you may still have a problem there. The dBv reference is defined to be one volt. Thus 5 mV relative to one volt expressed in dBv would be dB = 20 log (5x10^-3)/1 = -46 dB Since we
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00693.html (12,342 bytes)

28. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Sat Jul 26 12:11:12 2003
Yes, Mark, you have identified the whole point of this discussion. Good on you! The notion that "the input should be 5 mV or -67 dB" is meaningless in itself as I have tried to demonstrate with the f
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00703.html (10,698 bytes)

29. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Sat Jul 26 19:37:27 2003
Ken, it sounds like you might be thinking of the dBu, which is a dB reference widely used in the professional audio world. Its definition is a product of the National Association of Broadcasters. At
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00717.html (15,303 bytes)

30. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Sat Jul 26 22:46:19 2003
Thanks very much, Paul, for adding some background to my previous posting(s). I was beginning to think that I was preaching to an empty church from the lack of responses! <:} Now, if we can just get
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00722.html (14,702 bytes)

31. [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jul 30 14:26:21 2003
Right, Tom - many references and a lot of confusion when people start mixing them. I notice on my 606A that while the 0 dB scale on the *attenuator* is linked to the 0-0.3 volt *meter* scale, when th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00765.html (9,425 bytes)

32. [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jul 30 18:49:49 2003
Eric, I once challenged ARRL on "bauds" and they sent me a copy of some ITU spec that used that term. They argued that if it is proper to use "Ohms" and "volts" then it is equally proper to use "baud
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00777.html (8,972 bytes)

33. [TenTec] Future TT projects (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Mon Jun 2 12:36:42 2003
What happened is that IBM is no longer a player in the PC building and selling market . . . they gave away the store to Microsoft and Intel in order to "expand the market." It expanded right past the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00045.html (8,173 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 10:15:08 2003
I'm not sure that it buys much, Mark,unless there is a problem with the rig. But, it is sorta like a fine car and its speedometer: you really expect it to read "right on the money." My Icom PRO2 usua
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00150.html (13,027 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 20:18:59 2003
Glad to be of help, Bill - I devised this method a couple of years ago and most who have tried it seem to appreciate its simplicity, ease of use and seeming accuracy. I should have mentioned, althoug
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00195.html (11,034 bytes)

36. [TenTec] My Orion's "Dial" Accuraccy (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 20:58:44 2003
That is the purpose of measuring the WWV audio tone frequency in AM mode, Dan. That takes dial calibration out of the picture. If the measured tone frequency is in error, then you are correct: the so
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00200.html (10,575 bytes)

37. [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 21:08:35 2003
Bill, make sure to use the lowest possible signal level into the program for best accuracy. The trace should be clearly visible but very little background noise should appear. Overdriving will introd
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00201.html (10,896 bytes)

38. [TenTec] TenTec Mic Connectors (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 21:33:41 2003
My first crystal radio - age probably 7 or 8 - was made by "Philmore." An old name indeed . . . 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00205.html (8,478 bytes)

39. [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 22:24:24 2003
Yeah, you can force yourself, Bill! <:} Judging from some of the reports that have been posted, the Argo is doing much better than some ORION, both in accuracy and stability. 73/72, George Amateur Ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00211.html (11,162 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Wed Jun 4 22:28:09 2003
Yeah, Bill, sometimes what we don't know doesn't worry us! <:} Might be worth the time and effort to zero everything in and then keep an eye on things as time moves on. Actually a daily log would pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00212.html (11,108 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu