Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:23:55 -0500
Yeah, you can force yourself, Bill! <:} Judging from some of the reports that have been posted, the Argo is doing much better than some ORION, both in accuracy and stability. Hi George, I wonder if I
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00209.html (11,726 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:27:31 -0500
Yeah, Bill, sometimes what we don't know doesn't worry us! <:} Might be worth the time and effort to zero everything in and then keep an eye on things as time moves on. Actually a daily log would pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00210.html (11,672 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] RFI update (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:27:30 -0500
One key point is whether the computer system is approved by the FCC as Class A or B. If B, it should not be radiating much if any trash. If A, you take your chances. If not approved at all, which is
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00389.html (10,477 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] RX-340 and the hp GPS Freq Std. (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:11:55 -0500
Jim, you can check the ORION's dial accuracy the same way. Set the dial to 10,001.000 LSB and see what DigiPan tells you it reads for 1000 Hz. If there is an externally accessible adjustment of the m
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00412.html (11,010 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Orion Bottom Cover (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:51:37 -0500
Jim, I use both MixW and DigiPan and have found that DigiPan seems to be better at making these frequency measurements. It seems to home in on the frequency quicker and more accurately and then to fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00472.html (9,273 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Orion Bottom Cover (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 20:22:23 -0500
Glad it works for you. I think you will find DigiPan a little easier to use for this . . . regardless of the program, though, you can end up chasing your tail! Have you thought about drilling a small
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00477.html (10,608 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ roofing filter (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:18:42 -0500
In order to contain strong signals and spurs, as well as perform their fundamental job of image-rejection, roofing filters must be installed as near the front-end of the receiver as possible. The pre
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00526.html (10,468 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Hiss and click on Orion sidetone (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:18:13 -0500
Doesn't the ORION already have series resistors in each phone lead at the phone jack? ohm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00778.html (12,019 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Low power output on Argonaut V (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:27:15 -0500
Patrick, start looking at how and why the SWR in the line from the tuner to the antenna is 1:1. That cannot be right unless the antenna input impedance is exactly the same as the Zo of the line. If i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00843.html (10,621 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Low power output on Argonaut V (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:49:14 -0500
Pat, what you are tuning to have a 1:1 SWR is the line between the tuner and the rig. The line between the tuner and the antenna will have the same SWR on it whether or not you use a tuner, etc. That
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00860.html (14,149 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Low power output on Argonaut V (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:37:58 -0500
I have probably posted too much on this topic, but the author alludes to a point that can cause problems if not taken into consideration. Most 'amateur' dummy loads are really not exactly 50 ohm resi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00871.html (10,722 bytes)

72. [TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Orion Filters (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:51:21 -0500
Carl, I presume that your data is for the cascade of the analog roofing filter and the IF DSP filter in each case. Do you plan to make more extensive passband measurements using a noise generator and
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00149.html (8,685 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] CW on 60m (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:06:04 -0500
1.4 KHz lower, not 1.5 KHz - ??? one?
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00408.html (10,396 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] BSR fond memories (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:16:07 -0500
Like my 676? <:} consoles
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00411.html (8,536 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:26:31 -0500
Where did the idea of "rock-bound" and crystals come from?
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00431.html (9,276 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] New and Coming 60 meter channels (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:36:01 -0500
Because it is not a damped wave which is what the old spark gap rigs put out. The dot or dash would start out at full amplitude and then start decaying or damping at a rate not to exceed a certain am
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00433.html (10,436 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 23:20:25 -0500
Well, maybe, but I think that I'll just set the dial to the proper frequency for the center of a 2.8 KHz (or less) occupied bandwidth less 1400 Hz. Haven't used crystals since 1947 when I built my fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00454.html (9,513 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 01:33:26 -0500
The government and the military, in short. They specify frequency in terms of the center frequency of the occupied bandwidth or channel width. Hams use the transmitted frequency for all carrier-prese
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00466.html (10,401 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 02:22:52 -0500
Boy, I sure hope you can! That was a wowzer of a typo, wasn't it? <:} Funny thing, I did not notice it at all until I re--read your posting. I guess we all sorta knew what you meant . . . Thanks, Kip
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00467.html (9,324 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:01:03 -0500
You have described one of the several heartburn areas in the R&O. Determining compliance with the "50 watts ERP" with an arbitrary antenna setup is another. I think that the intent of the language is
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00477.html (15,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu