Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w6wqc@dslextreme.com: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:11:51 -0700
Steve: It tells you that, everything being equal, the Omni is superior. AL, w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00534.html (8,225 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Re: TenTec QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:38:27 -0700
In all the talk about Tentec QSK I am curious on how you break: One dot or one dash? Series of dots and/or dashes? Hold down a straight key for a moment? Repeatedly try one of the above until it work
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00910.html (8,587 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] new owner Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:00:35 -0700
Skip wrote, referring to the Orion: Gee! I thought the Omni VI + manual was at the head of the 'It sucks!' list. Fortunately, it is offset by the superb performance of the rig itself. 73, Al, w6wqc P
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00217.html (7,662 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Re: TenTec manual (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:59:22 -0700
Tnx, Stuart, I scoured the web site and could not find such an animal. I bought my rig on July, 1998, serial no. 04A10018. I am capable of fixing whatever may go wrong provided I have adequate docume
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00275.html (7,546 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Quite PWR SUPPLY? (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:34:39 -0800
is I jammed a toothpick between the top cover and front panel. :-) 73, AL, w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00084.html (8,570 bytes)

26. [TenTec] post sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:17:08 -0800
Post sweepstakes comment. The Omni VI + remains the best cw contest rig ever designed and crafted by man or beast not only for it's superb performance but for ease of operation in a contest environme
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00155.html (7,505 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:51:59 -0700
During a WW11 Navy tour, I got my copying speed up to 65 wpm in a couple of weeks copying the press stations of the day. As I recall, I never had any problem whatsoever doing it. I have absolutely no
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00350.html (7,903 bytes)

28. [TenTec] "Radiates like Crazy" (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:37:45 -0700
Rather than taking up more bandwidth on the reflector, please check out 'Antennas and Feedlines' at http://members.dslextreme.com/users/w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00307.html (6,677 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 lightning rule (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:14:55 -0800
Where did you get the big double pole double throw switch from? I've been looking for one for YEARS. 73, al, w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00399.html (7,617 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:58:26 -0700
Hi, Carl. I have Visual Basic 6.0 and I will be glad to mail you a CD disk. No charge. Let me know if you want it. 73, AL w6wqc _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00291.html (7,706 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Orion at Field Day (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:22:04 -0700
Oh, excellent post Ron, I love it! 73, AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00416.html (8,089 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:57:01 -0800
Easy way to check for keying chirp on an Omni 6+, or any other rig for that matter, is to put it on 160 meters and listen to the 16 th harmonic on the ten meter band. Any chirp will be magnified 16 t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00276.html (9,138 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] New Sherwood Presentation - Powerpoint & Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:51:11 -0700
Terry, N4TZ/9 has touched on an important point that has long been a priority on my list of receiver specifications that are relevant and those that are less relevant. Two tone IMD is not at the top
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00228.html (8,246 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509 (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 13:41:39 -0700
It is not possible to say due to lack of data. However, as a first guess, an L network is a good candidate to provide the least match loss. You have at least two possible configurations of the two re
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00108.html (8,581 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:57:44 -0700
When properly adjusted, the tuner at the antenna feedpoint results in a 1:1 swr ratio on the feedline thereby eliminating whatever line loss would have been suffered depending on what the swr happene
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00080.html (8,231 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 14:57:01 -0700
'snip' As Jerry points out, there are some amongst us who believe that a tuner at the antenna feed point tunes the antenna wire to resonance. It does not. Consider a wire longer than a halfwave lengt
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00083.html (9,610 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 18:19:14 -0700
'snip" Perhaps I should have said that it establishes a 'conjugate match' to avoid confusion.. In a system such as rig/tuner/line/antenna a conjugate match established at any point in that system res
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00092.html (10,510 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:28:49 -0700
Does coax radiate? Here is another point of confusion. Assume a properly terminated coax fed dipole. The RF travels along the surface of the inner conductor and along the inside of the shield. When t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00099.html (9,529 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:12:27 -0700
I did not say that you had to use a resonant line to eliminate the problem I said that it was ONE way to do it, which it is. In addition, I also made reference to a balun but did not elaborate on it
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00138.html (8,879 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:10 -0700
Zero reactance in a wire antenna feedpoint is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it to be truly resonant. Citing the Antenna Fundamentals, chap 2, page 2-1 of my 16th addition of The ARRL A
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00147.html (9,388 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu