Mail Archive Search: <+from:w6wqc@dslextreme.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w6wqc@dslextreme.com: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:24:46 -0700; Yes. Although I have very fond memories of the Navy RBL-7. A regenerative receiver no less! 73, AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00161.html (8,027 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:34:02 -0700; 'snip' When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the discussion, that I meant any length wire that had it's reactance cancelled leaving the wire length intact. I hope this clears u; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00162.html (9,490 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:53:01 -0700; 'snip' When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the discussion, everyone would know that I meant any length wire that had it's reactance cancelled leaving the wire length intact.; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00163.html (9,890 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:53:13 -0700; 'snip' When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the discussion, everyone would know that I meant any length wire that had it's reactance cancelled leaving the wire length intact.; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00164.html (9,568 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:13:38 -0700; No, I didn't miss that. read my post again. With reference to another post, I wish to add that antenna Q has nothing to do with the current in the wire. The current is computed from ohm's law that s; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00166.html (9,781 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ great CW rig (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:12:49 -0700; I want to investigate the feasability of using a XF-9NB 8-pole filter as a roofing filter in a Omni six plus. Does anyone know if the Inrad board, which I understand is available without a filter, ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00260.html (8,293 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:01:20 -0700; With an L network antenna tuner there are always at least two possible combinations of L and C to provide a match. Under certain conditions of the source and load impedances, there are four possible; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00330.html (9,213 bytes)
48. [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:17:16 -0700; Any complex source impedance can be matched to any complex load impedance by two L network configurations. One will be a low pass (series L and shunt C) while the other will be a high pass configurat; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00335.html (11,092 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:29:55 -0700; Oh, Yes. Absolutely. Notice that in my first example the position or location of the L and C are interchanged but their values are different. Yes, for a given location of the L and C you correctly st; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00337.html (9,403 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Roofing filter (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:46:11 -0700; Is there a schematic available somewhere of the roofing filter PC board for the Omni six +? AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00362.html (6,802 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:49:23 -0800; A G5RV fed with open wire feedline and a tuner will work just as well as a regularly configured G5RV. The flat top wire does the radiating and it is the same length in either configuration so the res; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00495.html (7,995 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:07:51 -0800; It wasn't clear but I meant a perfect 1:1 swr looking from the transmitter. Not on the line itself. The line has a high swr on some bands but the loss is minimal compared at any other type of feedli; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00006.html (7,798 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-VI problem (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:18:54 -0700; Look for the easy thing first. Is your lock button pushed in? 73, AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00022.html (6,816 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Please trim your replies! (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:10:25 -0800; Amen, Kevin, amen! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00095.html (6,813 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] for you cw guys (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:37:01 -0700; John: Is something wrong with your Orion keyer? If we don't know what you have determined is wrong with it, it is not possible to tell you if the logikey works any better. Does it vary the spacing wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00294.html (8,021 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 55
Page: [1] [2] [3]