Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8au@sssnet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8au@sssnet.com: 332 ]

Total 332 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec]: Radios? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:46:07 -0500; At 07:08 PM 03/30/2004, Jeff Casey wrote: Welcome back to the hobby. Just to clue you in, "Elmers" must now be called "mentors", ............................................................. I must b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00865.html (8,986 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] The Paragon - Your opinion please (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:40:14 -0500; At 10:54 AM 03/31/2004, M. P. Haynes wrote: I believe there is one wire you can cut that will enable transmission on any frequency. Maybe someone else can answer for sure. Yes, not a wire, but a plug; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00898.html (8,069 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] Can Iambic be used as single Paddle (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:52:01 -0400; At 08:48 AM 04/26/2004, Bill W4ZV wrote: Count me as one who believes iambic keying is an invention of the devil. In my mind it offers no obvious advantages and overly complicates the process of send; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00487.html (9,086 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] CW A/B modes (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:17:37 -0400; At 12:20 AM 05/12/2004, Alfred Lorona wrote: The differences between the two modes are really quite subtle. It was first identified as a design parameter by famed keyer designed Chet Opal, w9to, in 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00335.html (7,542 bytes)
125. [TenTec] Re: Ebay (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:55:11 -0400; At 05:54 AM 07/16/2004, Lou Dibble wrote: .He bid past my maximum bid and then canceled his last bid leaving me the winner at my maximum bid. I think I shall not buy again on Ebay. It is a shame that; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00471.html (8,011 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:06:32 -0400; At 09:33 PM 07/15/2004, al_lorona@agilent.com wrote: I just saw the Icom 7800 review for the first time. Without ragging on the reviewers, because I'm sure they are all good guys, this review tells m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00472.html (8,185 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] Stupid Tech Question On Hookup Of Station (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:39:42 -0400; At 09:40 PM 07/23/2004, OTAKEBI@aol.com wrote: I have my monitor scope and freq. counter hooked up after my Antenna Tuner. Should they remain like that or should they be placed before the tuner and m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00739.html (8,203 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin' (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:25:07 -0400; At 06:53 PM 08/02/2004, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: Ten Tec did in effect make a single band cw rig. it was also a single band phone rig, and a mobile rig. It was called the Scout. Small transceiver, 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00083.html (9,545 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] Why "roofing" ? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:58:45 -0400; At 01:46 PM 08/03/2004, Able2fly@aol.com wrote: Can someone please explain how a "roofing" filter differs from the old fashioned (band pass) IF filter? Or is it just another name for it? Bill: It app; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00121.html (8,066 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] Re: 100w mobile rig, etc. (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:33:44 -0400; At 11:25 AM 08/04/2004, you wrote: Answer: Overall possible practical mobile antenna system efficiency on 75 meters is limited to approximately 5%. Even this is unlikely to be achieved. Go gettum, Ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00194.html (7,389 bytes)
131. RE: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:46:45 -0400; At 10:37 PM 08/04/2004, you wrote: Bob (or others), do the traffic nets (NTS) in CW still exist? I thought PR would have eliminated them. Yes. Still humming along, altho with less tfc, and some purpo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00195.html (7,728 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] QSK (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:39:35 -0400; At 09:38 AM 08/16/2004, Dave Edwards wrote: The original post said "the majority of cw ops prefer QSK" Which I still hold is far from correct. There is life outside TenTec, and the average YaeComWood; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00708.html (10,472 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] Stompin to the QSK (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:32:02 -0400; At 08:57 AM 08/17/2004, Steve, n4lq wrote: How am I supposed to use a foot switch with my feet propped up on the desk? Bill must be one of those guys who can rub his stomach and pat his head at the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00784.html (8,972 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] OMNI D type C help (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:10:37 -0400; At 01:04 PM 08/18/2004, you wrote: those radios can go into oscillation if their ALC circuit is not working properly. The ALC voltage is generated by diodes which are on the same board as the SWR dio; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00815.html (7,812 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni 6+ like new (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:53:22 -0400; At 11:09 PM 08/29/2004, you wrote: This Omni 6+, model 564, is probably the closest you will come to getting a brand new one. Aw, shucks, Steve...... was all this due to my sig report a few days ago?; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01150.html (7,636 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni 6+ like new (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:36:10 -0400; At 12:53 AM 08/30/2004, I wrote: Aw, shucks, Steve...... was all this due to my sig report a few days ago? Ya know, the "microchirp" thing? :-) Or do ya have grand things in mind? :-) Sorry, wrong gu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01152.html (7,458 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Trade Orion for Collins gear (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:53:16 GMT; Hey, Ron: Thanks for your "update!" So what's a true BA guy like you doing with an Orion? :-) I like the Orion, but won't be spending that much right away for a rig, and definitely not 10K for a Yae; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00838.html (7,662 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] OUT OF HAM BAND MODIFICATION (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:35:53 -0500; At 11:12 PM 12/7/04, Robert Lutz wrote: Does anyone have the modification to make the Paragon transmit out of band Go to logic board, find plug labeled "Ham band" (or similar). Unplug. Done. Been man; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00257.html (7,576 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] scout newbie (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:54:55 -0500; At 11:37 PM 12/17/04, Rick Williams wrote: Mark I'd sure question the module! Take the module out and gently take a pencil eraser to the contacts. Clean it off and re-insert it and try again. It shou; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00657.html (8,135 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] Paragon memories (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:49:31 -0500; At 12:58 PM 12/18/04, you wrote: The only real problem I have had is that the memories were lost after only about 4 days of not using the rig.. I replaced the 9v. NiMh. batt, and ran the radio for se; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00681.html (7,885 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]