Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8au@sssnet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8au@sssnet.com: 332 ]

Total 332 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] D-104 and Paragon (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 23:08:51 -0400; I have found that a 10-D dynamic sounds better than a D-104 on the Paragons I have. Both are by Astatic and have the same base connector. FWIW, Perry w8au ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00066.html (7,393 bytes)
162. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:03:26 -0400; Not sure about the Para II but the original Para will have more sensitivity on MF if you remove a jumper (#51?) from logic board to the rf amp. It stops the logic from putting in the attenuator on th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00495.html (8,549 bytes)
163. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 03:35:05 -0400; Glad to hear that the rigs are similar in this respect. You should notice 12-15 dB improvement in sensitivity as I did. Have fun.... Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00523.html (8,495 bytes)
164. Re: [TenTec] K2ORS homily (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:12:01 -0400; Yes, but he sure sounded like his shorts were a little too tight! :-) Hearing him at Dayton and on other transcriptions (plus his cameo appearance on "Christmas Story") his voice was about an octave; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00979.html (7,587 bytes)
165. Re: [TenTec] Example of inebriated gobbledegook! (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:41:29 -0400; At 11:22 PM 7/24/05, Chuck Gerarden wrote: (main points?) OM, read your original post when you "sober up." "Embarrassment" will be an understatement! _______________________________________________ T; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00983.html (8,452 bytes)
166. Re: [TenTec] FS: Titan 3 and more clearance (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:24:39 -0400; Tnx for the update on Ted. Sorry to get it this way instead of over the air....... Will there be any way for Ted to operate from the rest home? It has been done before, dependent on the rest home pol; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00032.html (7,332 bytes)
167. Re: [TenTec] [RFI] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:30:11 -0400; Whirlpool is buying Maytag. They outbid the Chinese. Not much satisfaction with this new owner, either! Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00169.html (8,227 bytes)
168. Re: [TenTec] Station (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:33:41 -0500; If "beginner" is a good benchmark, you can fill the bill with a Century 21 digital. 70W input/35W output. The five major HF bands prior to WARC...80/40/20/15/10. CW only with DirectConversion receive; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00083.html (7,576 bytes)
169. Re: [TenTec] Station / C-21 (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:18:24 -0500; Nope As a beginner I spent 3 years with a Hallicrafters S-19R, wide as a barn and full of images... learned a lot about MENTAL selectivity at that time, which is a valuable asset to have. :-) The dir; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00098.html (9,175 bytes)
170. Re: [TenTec] Scout mount measurements (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:10:30 -0500; Agree totally. I sold my mount after deciding I could build a better one for mobile use using 1/8" aluminum. Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00179.html (7,791 bytes)
171. Re: [TenTec] FS: collectors' paddle (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:01:11 -0500; Is it gone yet? My mobile VSL is so dusty and crusty I better get a spare so I can dump the old one in the dishwasher! :-) What do these original $79.95 beauties go for now? 73, Perry _______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00365.html (7,040 bytes)
172. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II and 960 power supply FS (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:01:32 -0500; Hey, did you make it to the Hamfest? Didn't see ya, but that doesn't mean much.... way to busy at the auction... Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00412.html (7,259 bytes)
173. Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:52:13 -0500; Not wanting to continue a subject that is not germain to this list, I will briefly say that I understand the recent trend to CW ops using more bugs than in the past 20 years. As a kid I entered the h; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00434.html (10,096 bytes)
174. Re: [TenTec] low RF output on 80 meters with Argosy and Century 22 (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:56:12 -0500; Now this is odd. One rig, yes, but two? First thing to check is the 80M low pass output filter. One of my C21's had similar problem and found a bad cap in the LP filter. PB __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00095.html (7,885 bytes)
175. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:28:36 -0500; Larry Worth must have been hiding in his office! :-) Next time ask for Larry... he used to be the Repair Dept manager during that period of time but got promoted. He would bend over backward to help,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00585.html (7,760 bytes)
176. Re: [TenTec] using the D-104 on the jupiter or triton IV (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:16:18 -0500; Mike: Maybe that's due to the carrier osc needing tweaking so that the sideband filter passes more balanced audio. My D-104 and Triton 4 have always received wonderful reports. w8au _________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00775.html (8,478 bytes)
177. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Model 100 (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 20:34:49 -0500; Check with Mike, WB8VGE. He has worked with them. prosolar@sssnet.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00191.html (6,839 bytes)
178. Re: [TenTec] Calls?? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:29:55 -0500; Gee, Ray, what happened to K2QBW? I have your QSL from the seventies... and what about that Sputnik reception back in 1957? Was it KN2QBW then? Still chasing satellites? Perry w8au (w8vyu in 1955-75); /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00467.html (9,233 bytes)
179. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Questions (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:59:55 -0500; Another good one (on Paragon) is the Astatic 10D dynamic. w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00503.html (7,345 bytes)
180. Re: [TenTec] SWR? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:55:33 -0500; Don't forget the original Maxwell QST articles that went for many months. Real eye-openers for those that bothered to read them thoroughly.... De-bunked a lot of myths that apparently are STILL aroun; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00672.html (8,685 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]