Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8au@sssnet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8au@sssnet.com: 332 ]

Total 332 documents matching your query.

81. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 14:56:49 -0500; Jim: Possibly it's your QTH....but here in the Northeast there is no lack of CW activity during the day...from 40 meters on up. Having surveyed the CW scene since 1954, I notice MORE CW activity duri; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00039.html (13,731 bytes)
82. [TenTec] 12V OPS C-21 (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 14:41:44 -0500; Alan: The 12 V operation was accomplished by "back feeding" the 12 into the "Auxiliary 12V jack" (phono jack). This had to be done carefully, as you then had NO meter indication for input power. You; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00040.html (8,577 bytes)
83. [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 16:12:29 -0500; Jim: I did not say most hams were on CW today. I did say that mid-day CW activity is greater today than decades ago. I remember those earlier years as being very quiet during the day, especially 40M.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00044.html (9,170 bytes)
84. [TenTec] Omni VI chirp comment (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 17:45:58 -0500; Right, Steve..... the old tried, true method (listen with a critical ear) is to switch sidebands....if you hear a "yoop" on one sideband you will hear a "bloop" on the other. This is a dead givaway.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00094.html (9,102 bytes)
85. [TenTec] One last chirp (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 00:32:38 -0500; .....considering that those of us with long experience with TT are used to, and expect, excellent CW keying, it's hard to accept anything less. TT's organization and engineering were originally by g; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00129.html (10,937 bytes)
86. [TenTec] One, final, final chirp (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 10:48:10 -0500; Yes, Jerry.... Sounds a lot like the "parsing" of words done by Slick Willy ("depends on what the definition of "is" is...." etc.) Like Red Skelton used to say..."I calls 'em like I sees 'em," (hears; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00141.html (7,739 bytes)
87. [TenTec] One, final, final chirp (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:27:57 -0500; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://w; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00146.html (9,360 bytes)
88. [TenTec] W1AW - To Chirp or Not To Chirp (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:02:37 -0500; Steve: Up until they "went commercial" with the Harris gear, they always built their own. And, yes, their own gear always keyed wonderfully. The last HB gear used a "master freq source" feeding all P; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00169.html (7,824 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Re: CW Practice on Omni (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:26:03 -0500; Steve: No weighting control on the Scout. It's determined by the programming of the RISC microprocessor. TT normally burns them in at 65/35 weighting, not 50/50. However, when I ordered mine, I talk; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00265.html (8,544 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Re: Keeping a rig turned on continuously (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:17:49 -0500; Hey Royboy: I now know why I don't hear you much in the P.M......you're getting addicted to this reflector stuff.....be careful. Your story is well taken, but, let me tell you this one... Back years; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00450.html (9,918 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] Using Scout w/external keyer (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:39:20 -0400; At 04:20 PM 08/26/2003, Andrew Moore wrote: I understand the Scout has a problem with drift when using the internal keyer, especially at higher speeds. I guess this is a result of the way the micropo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00570.html (10,196 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] Using Scout w/external keyer (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:51:03 -0400; At 02:05 PM 08/27/2003, Bill Rowlett wrote: You all must remember that the Scout and the qrp Argo do not have the conventional TT PTO. I am not sure that refering to it as a PTO is correct either. Wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00594.html (8,585 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] Titan 425 and Paragon 585 and lots of non-Ten-Tec gear (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:47:26 -0400; At 01:49 PM 09/01/2003, you wrote: Lots of H-P and Tektronix test equipment, RF and audio type. H-P606A H-P608E Marconi RF generators Lots of 465 scopes Many 403B, 400el, 400FL AC VMs etc. Stan: Do y; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00022.html (7,959 bytes)
94. [TenTec] Re: ON4UN Orion Review (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:00:17 -0400; http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/topband/2003-October/017574.html Hey Gary: Check this out..... Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00007.html (7,220 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II demise? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:07:37 -0400; At 05:24 PM 10/06/2003, Mark wrote: I believe one of the problems were that the final transistors were either hard or impossible to find replacements for. You're thinking of the Hercules I. The Herc; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00179.html (7,797 bytes)
96. Re: [TenTec] Scout Questions (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:52:40 -0400; At 12:38 AM 10/11/2003, you wrote: Did the early rigs transmit full power in the tune position? YES According to the manual and from everything I have read it says 15 watts on tune. A LATER CHANGE. H; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00352.html (9,027 bytes)
97. Re: [TenTec] WTB Omni Rack mount (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:03:31 -0400; At 02:46 PM 10/14/2003, Frank wrote: Looking for a pair of the rack mount adapters that TT used to make for the Omni transceievers. Called the factory but they have none and they are discontinued. An; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00486.html (7,981 bytes)
98. Re: [TenTec] 450 ohm open line feed with ten tec tuner (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:12:12 -0400; At 08:11 PM 10/19/2003, you wrote: now, it's been a while since I've used open line, but any ideas on how to get it into the shack? and, should I use a external balun with the 238 tuner to keep the o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00598.html (8,818 bytes)
99. Re: [TenTec] FS RX10 receiver (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 23:58:51 -0500; At 05:38 AM 10/20/2003, you wrote: I have a Tentec RX10 receiver. Did you ever sell this rcvr? Tnx, Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00101.html (7,016 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] Q: Ant for hotel use (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 23:55:57 -0500; At 07:33 PM 11/08/2003, jdanter wrote: Starting a new job with heavy travel. I would appreciate suggestions on an ant for hotel use. Today's new hotels do not have windows that open. Almost impossibl; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00216.html (7,525 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]