Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9ac@arrl.net: 361 ]

Total 361 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] re: Orion command set and interface info (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:34:02 -0400
I imagine guys like Carl, N4PY will easily develop some form of software translation table into the software (like he has now), which will allow the GUI software to control one of many different Ten-
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00254.html (8,697 bytes)

82. [TenTec] ORION DISPLACES ELECRAFT K2 FOR TOP RX PERFORMANCE (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:10:09 -0400
I just compared the Orion specs against those posted on the Elecraft web site. If the ARRL lab's test results confirm Ten-Tec's posted specification, the Orion will blow the K2 out of the water in te
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00029.html (7,790 bytes)

83. [TenTec] Omni 6 to QRP (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:02:24 -0400
I can get my Omni Six down to less than 1-watt, so I'm not sure why yours would be different. The Omni V required a resistor change on an op-amp to reduce the minimum output power to less than ten wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00123.html (7,866 bytes)

84. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:53:13 -0400
Hmmm....I had thought IP (e.g. IP2 - IP3) refered to "Intercept Point" as an intermod measuring basis for receive performance, not the transmitter...or is my assumption incorrect? If so, then how is
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00235.html (11,239 bytes)

85. [TenTec] No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:01:53 -0400
That would be a good test and something that may be worth testing and measuring for all transceivers as part of the full ARRL lab reports. As a practical matter, I often tune my Pegasus for Hi-Fi SSB
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00250.html (11,826 bytes)

86. [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:54:28 -0400
One solution is to post new software/firmware as "BETA TEST ONLY." If you're up to it, download the software and be part of a group who is willing to test drive it and record and report any imperfect
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00492.html (11,529 bytes)

87. [TenTec] Microphone on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:37:17 -0400
I've heard Carl with his Heil Goldline and Pegasus...outstanding audio quality! Paul, W9AC audio. OK act small have
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00009.html (11,045 bytes)

88. [TenTec] Orion Specs? (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:20:41 -0400
Jay, W5JAY had the unique opportunity to tour the Ten-Tec factory last weekend and make a purchase on a new RX-340 receiver. While he was there, he had a .JPG photo taken of himself next to an Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00134.html (9,147 bytes)

89. [TenTec] Qs-Triton IV (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:52:22 -0400
That's the truth Paul. Come to think of it, Ten-Tec is the only manufacturer of equipment where I do not have to conduct an exhaustive research into the serial number-mod sheet to see if it's a "80
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00254.html (7,015 bytes)

90. [TenTec] Pegasus R/C Internet Software (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:28:21 -0400
Anyone know what happened to the link for N2JEU remote control software to remote control a Pegasus or Jupiter transceiver via the Internet? I want to download the software but the link appears inact
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00424.html (6,804 bytes)

91. [TenTec] Fw: [TenTec_Orion] Orion at HamCom (Arlington Texas) (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:11 -0400
Having various roofing filters available as an option is a GOOD thing. Otherwise, the radio's strong signal receive performance would be similar to the ICOM PRO and others.... -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00132.html (11,570 bytes)

92. [TenTec] RX340 questions (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:53:50 -0400
knob has a skirt, and looks identical to the knob on my 302 tuning pod, but I can't seem to move it relative to the main knob. Yes, mine has adjustable drag. found a pinout in one drawing (figure 3-
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00350.html (9,307 bytes)

93. [TenTec] Jupiter QSK (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:32:34 -0400
I dusted off my Triton IV for the Field Day weekend and found that although the QSK is good, it still doesn't beat the Omni Six or Pegasus in terms of the T/R turnaround time. If I go past ~ 20 WPM
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00378.html (7,463 bytes)

94. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:04:50 -0400
That's eHam's prerogative. I didn't have a chance to see the "review" in question, but I suspect that the content crossed the border between one that is a bona-fide review and one that perhaps invok
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00445.html (9,311 bytes)

95. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - the "Orion" Factor. (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:15:49 -0400
And it has been said time-and-again and is probably worth repeating...that you have 30-days to evaluate their products at no risk (less shipping); well enough time to figure out if you want the prod
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00446.html (9,630 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Ten Tec 253 Tuner (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:54:34 -0400
I've always been interested in the model 253 tuner . How well does it perform its automatic matching function into a wide array of impedances? -Paul, W9AC
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00036.html (8,633 bytes)

97. [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:33:46 -0400
Larry, From the Elecraft web site: "Adjustable 0.5-10 W PEP (PA option for higher power.)" The after-market PA option is going to be tricky for Elecraft. Neither Ten-Tec nor MFJ were successful in c
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00194.html (10,819 bytes)

98. [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:54:08 -0400
And how long is the warranty?
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00195.html (8,660 bytes)

99. [TenTec] Ten Tec 516 ---- Pre-Production Orders --- I'm missing something here. (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 17:30:37 -0400
It's not locked. You are not billed until shipment and can cancel at any time. Not exactly. You will be placed in a queue for delivery, with priority established by the order date. Great. You're app
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00198.html (7,374 bytes)

100. [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:17:10 -0400
Great review of the new K2 product. Looks like there may be several subtle differences between the K2 and K2/100. I have heard that the K2's QSK is good, but not excellent, and certainly not in the T
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00211.html (13,791 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu