Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Argosy Finals (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:53:47 -0400
Found it. The company is Advanced Semiconductor, Inc. An Internet search will find them. I do not know anything about the company and I am not endorsing them in any way. 73, -LeeWA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00004.html (7,753 bytes)

142. [TenTec] WTB 217 Filter (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:12:43 -0400
I'm still looking for a 217 filter. 500 Hz, 9Mhz, 8 pole. Anyone have one for sale? -LeeWA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00156.html (6,676 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V and an amplifier (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:41:02 -0400
I have an idle SB-200 here so I ran some tests to see what 20 watts drive would do. Found several interesting and maybe discouraging things. Forget about ALC. 20 watts will not drive the amp to anywh
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00294.html (11,402 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V and an amplifier (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:46:18 -0400
I thought of doing that but the question was how the SB-200 would work with the Argonaut V. Since it has only 20 watts max available, one cannot tune with any higher drive level. Before I put the amp
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00301.html (9,442 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V and an amplifier (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:30:11 -0400
OK, let me eat a little crow and try the numbers again. :-) Seems there are two peaks, on 40 meters anyway, and of course I got the wrong one first time around. The load control is now near max CCW.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00309.html (12,562 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec "banana" mic upgrade? (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:16:13 -0400
I'm not real sure it is a crystal element. I have seen those mics with ceramic and electret elements though as I recall. Does it work OK? Does it have a stereo type 1/4 inch plug or 4 conductor mic p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00440.html (8,603 bytes)

147. [TenTec] WTB Argosy Noise Blanker (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:57:54 -0400
Looking for Argosy or Argosy II noise blanker. Any floating around out there? -Lee WA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00529.html (7,017 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] WTB Argosy Noise Blanker (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:07:22 -0400
Thanks for the info Mike. I wondered if there might be two models. Interesting note though. I have both Argosy and Argosy II sharing one noise blanker. Don't know which model it is but I switch it be
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00545.html (8,857 bytes)

149. [TenTec] WTB 217 filter (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:52:56 -0400
Looking for a 217 filter. 500 Hz, 9Mhz, 8 pole. Anyone have one for sale? -LeeWA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00097.html (6,743 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Century 21 Tuning Knob (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:04:25 -0400
A very small hex wrench. Don't know exactly what size but it is small. There are various opinions about un-sticking stuck PTO shafts. In mine, the alcohol MAY work but I would not bank on it working
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00143.html (8,771 bytes)

151. [TenTec] Ramblings about 2.059d firmware (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:21:20 -0400
First impression is Nice Job Ten Tec! Still a couple bugs, maybe,but so far I like what I see. I'm not sure the unprocessed SSB audio is a good as 1.732 but with the processor on 4 or 5 it sounds pre
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00145.html (9,002 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 12:43:13 -0400
I imagine the Omni VII will have a significantly different first local oscillator than the Jupiter. The Jupiter tunes in 2.5 Khz steps with all finer tuning done in the DSP IF. That is possible becau
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00225.html (9,961 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII antenna tuner specs. (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:37:23 -0400
The limited matching range on 6 meters may have to do with the granularity of the L and C both of which are comprised of fixed values switched into the network binary fashion. One of my Ten Tec built
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00290.html (7,815 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Tech Topics (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:11:47 -0400
What about the Wadley Loop? It is my understanding that it provided a high degree of stability using a tunable (read drifty) VHF oscillator and a 1 Mhz crystal oscillator rich in harmonics along with
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00333.html (11,144 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Tech Topics (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:44:43 -0400
I realize those limitations. What I was getting at, apparently not very well, was that mixing schemes may indeed be able to minimize the effect of drift in oscillators. I was using the Wadley Loop as
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00335.html (11,439 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Why I love Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:05:31 -0400
Years ago I had an issue with my Paragon. Wrote Ten Tec about it and why I thought they did not do a very good job in the design. ( I have to laugh about that now, they did a fine job! :-) I still ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00341.html (8,360 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] House cleaning at N4PY (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:01:04 -0400
Hi Carl, I'm interested in the 217. Still available?? -Lee WA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00695.html (9,441 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Temporarily disabling Argonaut V transmitter (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:30:46 -0400
There may be another way to do it but I simply turn the power to zero and use a dummy load. Although the dummy load is probably not necessary, I feel better about having it in place. Since no power i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00061.html (9,042 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] PSK/RTTY Which rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:07:45 -0400
Pegasus. Hands down...........Pegasus. Although I have a number of rigs at my disposal, the Pegasus is the one I keep going back to for the digital modes. Beside working very well and being exception
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00092.html (10,039 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:54:40 -0400
I've had my O Classic for only a few months. Not a contester or DX'er so I don't use a lot of the capability of the radio. I do tinker a lot and use multiple modes though. After trying 2.056 and seve
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00599.html (9,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu