Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] combo rigs was receiver so-called performance (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:04:22 -0500
Hi Bob, Sounds to me like the rig you want to get is an Onmi VI+. I have an idea it would meet all your requirements nicely. The joining of two rigs is not too practical. It is more of an experiment
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00167.html (9,882 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] Argo V Comments (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:51:21 -0500
Not sure what picture you are looking at but my Argonaut has a SO-239 held in place with two 4-40 philips head screws. Same as every other rig I've had here in many years. Works fine! -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00214.html (8,028 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V Fan (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:35:57 -0500
Hello Mark, I think the fan is thermally controlled when it is installed as directed. Only runs when needed. If you connect it to the 12 volt jack, it will run all the time the radio is on, even if n
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00269.html (8,772 bytes)

244. RE: [TenTec] Argonaut V Fan (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:26:34 -0500
Nope! I should have emphasized "...THINK..." in my post. You are the second person to say it runs all the time. I got the idea that it was thermostatically controlled from the schematic which shows a
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00277.html (10,332 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:38 -0400
I guess the thread will die when we get tired talking about it. That's the nice thing about these reflectors.............kind of market driven! :-) Frankly, I enjoy these technical topics, at least I
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00043.html (10,244 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] Keep it on the Listserve (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:54:04 -0400
First of all Ditto to Chris' comments regarding Yahoo. I don't understand the reason for segmenting the group and I especially don't understand why anyone would want to "join" a Yahoo discussion grou
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00363.html (11,657 bytes)

247. [TenTec] Argonaut V (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:01:42 -0400
Please accept my apology for posting this twice. When I responded to Chris' posting I should have changed the subject since some may bypass the discussion on the "other" group but want to see discuss
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00364.html (12,535 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] argonaut V hidden talent not good (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:58:04 -0400
Hmmmm..........? is right. I listen to 30m on my Argonaut V almost every evening here in NW Pa and have not heard what you are hearing. I realize propagation and antenna pattern could be different bu
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00520.html (10,281 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:40:00 -0800
I'm not sure I understand your statement that this setup was doomed from the start. Perhaps it was for the 'PRO, although I thought they used the phasing method of sideband selection and generation.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00552.html (10,748 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:39:22 -0500
If you put things in perspective, I don't think it's at all surprising that 20 poles of Inrad in a Corsair and the DSP filtering of the PRO are superior to the Pegasus. It all boils down to one word.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00569.html (11,039 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] drift (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:43:44 -0400
If the display is not indicating drift and if the received signal is not drifting, then I would suspect something in the transmit carrier oscillator [BFO circuit]. The digital readout displays the pr
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00016.html (8,935 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:32:56 -0400
I agree with you Rich, Another problem that arises when a company "sells" open software is support. Suppose Ten Tec sold the internal software license to we users. Now........being the expert program
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00066.html (11,490 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus Plus observations (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:57:19 -0400
I'll be anxious to see if it will work on my setup. The first release I downloaded worked OK. The next release would work sometimes. The communications would fail intermittently. The last release wil
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00120.html (11,005 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus and RX-320 (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:23:59 -0400
Works very well with the N4PY software. AND, there are several freeware RX-320 control software packages for specialized applications like scanning, etc. You can't go wrong. -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00145.html (7,400 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] My beloved Paragon (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:31:20 -0400
Hello Wes, I have seen something like you describe occur as a result of PIN diode failure in the bandpass circuit board. In my case one or two diodes shorted and caused low output and loss of signal
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00168.html (10,163 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:28:29 -0400
I suspect George is referring to the third and fifth order IM products of the final amplifier of the Orion, not the IP3 and IP 5 intercept points of receiver. As far as what the IM products will be i
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00240.html (12,879 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:09:28 -0400
Perhaps the IM will not be too bad into mismatched loads. On the low Z side, the drive to the final in later Ten Tec rigs is limited by the current delivered to the PA. So, once the PA hits around 20
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00248.html (10,994 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:39:34 -0400
What am I missing here? I see a company that is dedicated to delivering exceptional radios at a fair price and then, for no additional charge, improving the product and delivering the result over the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00493.html (10,658 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:02:05 -0400
Yes Paul, that sounds like an interesting and effective way of upgrading the firmware. Of course, the big question is, how does it sound to the guys at Ten Tec? :-) Anyway, I don't mind trying out th
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00498.html (8,249 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] Re: synthesizers was Omni C (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:31:08 -0400
I found this to be true a few years ago when searching for a digitally controlled low noise VFO for a particular project. As I recall spurs in the DDS system were around 80db down or so out a few hun
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00533.html (11,460 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu