Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 319 ]

Total 319 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Truth in Lending!! (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:01:43 -0500; One thing we may be missing here, is that, based on published specs and features list, the Orion is in a class by itself. Therefore, cost comparisons are of limited usefulness. We will have to wait u; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00344.html (9,395 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri Jan 31 19:25:29 2003; No flames, I'm just wondering in what respects does the Corsair not come close? -Lee WA3FIY; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00756.html (7,837 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri Jan 31 20:55:52 2003; As you point out Paul, two very important specs are Phase Noise and close in Dynamic Range. There are some interesting numbers regarding the CorsairII and some of the other rigs mentioned. Unfortunat; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00760.html (9,689 bytes)
44. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:07:06 -0500; I concur. May be one of the best kept secrets around. I like to have an RF gain on a receiver so I simply wired a 500 ohm pot between the antenna cable and the antenna input connector. Really helps w; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00219.html (7,952 bytes)
45. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:13:05 -0500; Never paid much attention to that as I keep mine running 24/7. -Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00232.html (7,746 bytes)
46. Fw: [TenTec] Clear Speech Unit (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:55:48 -0500; One other matter to carefully........and I do mean carefully.........consider is the maximum volume level available at the headphones. It should be standard practice to limit the maximum volume at th; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00005.html (8,086 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:30:17 -0500; Bob, I know you addressed this question to George but I hope you don't mind if I respond also. I run a rig here I call the "SuperJupe". I thought of calling it Parater or Jupiton but I liked SuperJup; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00155.html (14,299 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Rcvr so-called performance figures (lo-o-ong) (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:31:24 -0500; Ooooops! In my earlier post I wrote "The result is a receiver with five stages of good crystal selectivity prior to the signal arriving at the DSP...". Guess I was in too much of a hurry. What I mean; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00159.html (9,601 bytes)
49. [TenTec] combo rigs was receiver so-called performance (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:04:22 -0500; Hi Bob, Sounds to me like the rig you want to get is an Onmi VI+. I have an idea it would meet all your requirements nicely. The joining of two rigs is not too practical. It is more of an experiment; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00169.html (9,372 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Argo V Comments (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:51:21 -0500; Not sure what picture you are looking at but my Argonaut has a SO-239 held in place with two 4-40 philips head screws. Same as every other rig I've had here in many years. Works fine! -Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00216.html (7,548 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Argonaut V Fan (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:35:57 -0500; Hello Mark, I think the fan is thermally controlled when it is installed as directed. Only runs when needed. If you connect it to the 12 volt jack, it will run all the time the radio is on, even if n; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00271.html (8,258 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Argonaut V Fan (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:26:34 -0500; Nope! I should have emphasized "...THINK..." in my post. You are the second person to say it runs all the time. I got the idea that it was thermostatically controlled from the schematic which shows a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00279.html (9,898 bytes)
53. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:38 -0400; I guess the thread will die when we get tired talking about it. That's the nice thing about these reflectors.............kind of market driven! :-) Frankly, I enjoy these technical topics, at least I; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00054.html (9,834 bytes)
54. [TenTec] Keep it on the Listserve (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:54:04 -0400; First of all Ditto to Chris' comments regarding Yahoo. I don't understand the reason for segmenting the group and I especially don't understand why anyone would want to "join" a Yahoo discussion grou; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00374.html (11,164 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Argonaut V (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:01:42 -0400; Please accept my apology for posting this twice. When I responded to Chris' posting I should have changed the subject since some may bypass the discussion on the "other" group but want to see discuss; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00375.html (12,108 bytes)
56. [TenTec] argonaut V hidden talent not good (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:58:04 -0400; Hmmmm..........? is right. I listen to 30m on my Argonaut V almost every evening here in NW Pa and have not heard what you are hearing. I realize propagation and antenna pattern could be different bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00531.html (9,746 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:40:00 -0800; I'm not sure I understand your statement that this setup was doomed from the start. Perhaps it was for the 'PRO, although I thought they used the phasing method of sideband selection and generation.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00563.html (10,378 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Receivability (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:39:22 -0500; If you put things in perspective, I don't think it's at all surprising that 20 poles of Inrad in a Corsair and the DSP filtering of the PRO are superior to the Pegasus. It all boils down to one word.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00580.html (10,705 bytes)
59. [TenTec] drift (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:43:44 -0400; If the display is not indicating drift and if the received signal is not drifting, then I would suspect something in the transmit carrier oscillator [BFO circuit]. The digital readout displays the pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00028.html (8,534 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:32:56 -0400; I agree with you Rich, Another problem that arises when a company "sells" open software is support. Suppose Ten Tec sold the internal software license to we users. Now........being the expert program; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00076.html (10,887 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]