Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 319 ]

Total 319 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:24:57 -0400; I think it's kind of an apples and oranges comparison. Besides the obvious difference of kit vs wired units, the Argonaut V offers 20 watts, many more filtering options, AM, FM, general coverage rece; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00189.html (9,740 bytes)
82. [TenTec] TT wants to go nose to nose with the K2???? (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:55:54 -0400; As far as I know, the K2 is 10 watts max. The BIg difference for me here is that when I want to run QRP I can do so easily with the Argonaut V stand-alone and when I want some power I can drive my 3-; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00196.html (10,990 bytes)
83. [TenTec] New TT QRP rig AM (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 20:19:58 -0400; In the past Ten Tec did not offer AM transmit on their rigs but with the introduction of the Pegasus that changed. Not immediately. It was a feature added by a firmware update some months after intro; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00205.html (8,526 bytes)
84. [TenTec] Re: Orion Concern (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:11:47 -0400; A radio costing $3300 or so should have............................have what? IMHO, it should have receiver [and transmitter] performance unavailable in any other amateur transceiver........PERIOD! A; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00419.html (10,079 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Jupiter QSK (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:21:32 -0500; Both.....................power from the transmitter is switched to the antenna connector via a reed relay. Receive signals are switched to the receiver via a diode switch. -Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00001.html (6,820 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Is Jupiter > Icom 746: what is "quiet"? (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 22:23:08 -0500; First I agree with previous statements that the PJ's are very quiet radios. When I first got my Pegasus, I thought for sure it was deaf, just like me. :-) However, after using it and a Jupiter I sub; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00043.html (11,492 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Jupiter assistance? (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:10:08 -0400; I think you hold down any key while turning the power on. Hold the key until a message comes on the screen indicating successful reset. Should be just a few seconds. This will clear all your memories; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00390.html (8,025 bytes)
88. [TenTec] Paragon less sensitivity on 12 and 10 meter (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:00:58 -0400; Check out the PIN switching diodes for the 12/10 meter receive bandpass filter. I'll bet there is a failed diode. Good hunting, -73- -Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00548.html (7,678 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Signal heard with AF gain at minimum (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:26:19 -0400; It is most likely due to the sensitivity of your headphones. The noise you are hearing is not the noise floor of the RX, it is the noise floor of the audio chain AFTER the volume control only. When y; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00594.html (9,104 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Bezel/tuning knob question (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:12:17 -0400; That's correct Gary. The Bezel is attached to the outer shaft of the VFO which is the shaft with the lead screw that moves the core into and out of the coil. Here's how I sync the bezel and the opera; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00607.html (8,460 bytes)
91. [TenTec] Bezel/tuning knob question (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:16:20 -0400; I wondered about that too Jerry, and came to the conclusion Gary was seeing the three little plastic protrusions that are melted down to hold the aluminum dial to the plastic collar that attaches to; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00608.html (8,919 bytes)
92. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:37:57 -0400; On 26 Apr 2002 at 9:44, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sa wrote: In a bizzare sort of way, these negative comments can also have a positive result. Please do not read into what I am about to say that I e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00713.html (12,140 bytes)
93. [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:59:24 -0400; Although I agree in part, there are some things about a radio, or any other piece of equipment for that matter, that we just cannot put into meaningful, measurable specs. The fianl test for a radio i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00761.html (9,008 bytes)
94. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:31:47 -0400; First of all Tim, in my mind the CorsairII is a "keeper". And I am one of those who actually like the operation of the hang AGC. I much prefer the hang action to AGC that is constantly changing the g; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00782.html (10,197 bytes)
95. [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:33:12 -0400; No, I don't think that was it. We were not building guitar amps where some "fuzz" and other stuff is the norm. We were building High Fidelity amplifiers where the company officials wanted the most fa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00783.html (9,912 bytes)
96. [TenTec] Ron Lee AGC mod for Omni (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:24:23 -0400; I have received several requests for info on the Ron Lee AGC mod. I purchased the Omni with the mod already in place many years ago. I don't know if there is any info on the Internet. All I have is s; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00785.html (6,798 bytes)
97. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:06:47 -0400; Good point Paul. I'm pretty sure the Pegasus and Jupiter use the phasing method of sideband generation and detection, in software of course, and at least in theory, can go down to DC response. Anothe; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00794.html (7,482 bytes)
98. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Ron Lee AGC (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:30:38 -0400; Thanks Barry, Looks like this matter was address before. One of these days I'm going to find the archives!!!! :-) Yes, this is a major modification and not for the faint of heart, but it does work! A; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00797.html (6,645 bytes)
99. [TenTec] auto tuner (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:01:14 -0500; I sure hope it does not have an internal tuner as standard. If they want to make one available as an option, OK, but I would not use the internal tuner and I sure don't want to pay for something I wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00303.html (8,347 bytes)
100. [TenTec] auto tuner (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 13:46:01 -0500; If you are referring to the internal "roofing" filters, you are quite right about not being required to buy them and that is a wonderful thing. If I am strictly a SSB operator, why would I want to bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00309.html (9,402 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]