Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa4et@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4et@hotmail.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:14:22 +0000; I have been using delta loops for years. The make nice low cost antennas, especialy for Feild Day, and other portable ops. Although I have never made a 80 meter loop, I have made 40-2 meters, and the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00525.html (10,148 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 238B Tuner Question (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:56:30 +0000; The knob is loose on my Variable Cap tuner, does anybody know how to access the set screw so I can tighten it up ? ? ? DAvid _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00188.html (7,255 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 238B Tuner Question (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:06:15 +0000; Thanks , you where write on. Only problem was, it was the inside coupling that was loose, not the knob. Oh well,,,, live and learn ! DAvid From: Curtis Rossow <curtisa%surfbest.net@pop.surfbest.net>; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00198.html (9,422 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] NTIA BPL Report released (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:01:13 +0000; I read the report, sounded like a nail in the coffin to me for BPL. THey may support the deployment of BPL, but when you read the whole report, they made it sound like a chinese firedrill when it com; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00567.html (8,936 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:56:39 +0000; WOW, makes some intersting reading, just more amunition to bury BPL. As least there seems to be some big money stepping into the room with more clout than the ARRL At least somebody else has said wha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00102.html (8,925 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] Boing - IEEE (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:57:56 +0000; Not sure what you mean there,, I read the whole thing just now From: <k4dlj@bellsouth.net> Reply-To: tentec@contesting.com To: <TenTec@contesting.com> Subject: [TenTec] Boing - IEEE Date: Wed, 5 May; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00103.html (8,087 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Resent BPL notices filed at the FCC (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:18:13 +0000; These are some recent replys as posted on the FCC website in regards to the BPL NPRM. THen there is the now famous NTIA,, make you wonder where the FCC is coming from NTIA http://www.ntia.doc.gov/nti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00119.html (8,059 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 18:48:13 +0000; YEP,, THATS MY TAKE ON IT, AS I EXPLAINED TO A FRIEND,, THE IEEE IS THE MOST ENCOMPASSING, BUT THE REST IF TAKEN AS A WHOLE, IS ALSO QUIT COMPELLING From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> Repl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00123.html (8,352 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] BPL, RFI & FCC (score: 1): Author: "David Price" <wa4et@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:16:35 +0000; Well I am glad somebody else pick up on this, I emailed this out to a few friends too, because I think is demostraits the FCC total lack of regard to there regularion in general. The part that I got; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00603.html (9,546 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]