Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4tt@nlamerica.com: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] New Location ? (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:59:47 GMT
Was told a few days ago that Ten Tec has decided on a new location very close to the original site. Any official word on this ? WA4TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00367.html (6,848 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] New Location ? (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:12:16 GMT
--Original Message-- From: "Richards  Stan Brock said they are moving about 200 yards South up the hill on the side street just behind the current location.____________________ Thanks James... that's
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00401.html (7,025 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] WRTC Scores (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:40:00 GMT
 "Carl wrote: My son N4YDU and his partner finished 20th out of 59.  But he and his partner also finished 5th in total QSO's.  They had 4408 QSO's.  That's an average of 92 QSO's per hour per person
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00438.html (8,269 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion AM ALC/304's (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:00:24 -0400
Yes, indeed. We actually had three pairs of P-P 304TLs, one pair each for 80, 40 and 20. The 2x 304TH modulator was, of course, switched between them. Those were the days. You fellows sure it wasn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00278.html (8,033 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Trouble Shooting Question (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:41:27 -0400
I did a search of the archives and did not find a situation that would be close to my issue. When this rig loss leds and control function this morning, it had not been in use except it was turned on
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00328.html (9,168 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Serious market overlooked by ham manufacturers (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:00:32 -0400
In a recent ARRL 6/27/08 web survey the question was ask, do you operate the 220 mhz band? Of 2991 responses the results were as follows: Frequently 5.9% Occasionally 10.7% Rarely 12.3% Never 71.1% T
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00015.html (10,014 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:00:50 -0400
If the delay at this stage is just another month or two more, that's understandable, but if we are talking about the board not being available until 2009, then I have a real problem with credibility
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00314.html (11,926 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Hey Scott is there some thing coming (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:42:29 -0400
I was reluctant to answer the survey.........Thinking I'm not representative of the "Now Generation" of hams. I will pay very good money for very good equipment........ but for my operating, I don't
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00254.html (8,518 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] power output of ten tec delta (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:02:28 -0400
-- Original Message -- From: "Mike Gorniak" < When the Commission change the rules to specify that Power was to be measured as the Actual Output Power, they set the maximum Amateur Output Power as 15
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00062.html (9,399 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] New Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:39:43 -0500
I received my new Omni VII last Thursday. I have been going almost 24/7 programming away enhancing my software to take advantage of this great radio. I heard Larry Worth break into a 75m qso Friday
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00058.html (8,145 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] ARRL (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:37:36 -0500
They did figure out before others to add 6m to most HF rigs. Most serious HFers and VHFers view that as a compromise. Give me a radio or converter thats designed for its freq of use. I can use my ol
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00382.html (8,276 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:55:44 -0500
The JA companies were the first offer rigs with an internal antenna tuner, a memory keyer, and memories. The JA's were also the first to offer me unheard of prices for some of my boatanchors. QSOed
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00394.html (8,521 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:00:02 -0500
It is easy to take care of the CW when on SSB. Just set the auto-notch to 9! Not if I'm on my old unstable homebrew rig. That auto-notch'll "nut up" trying to figure out where the carrier's comming
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00499.html (9,132 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] ORION2_HW-NOISE_BLANKER (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:19:42 -0500
The hardware noise blanker is too aggressive in my Orion2. I have power line noise on 160 meters and a variable HW noise blanker would be useful if it could be cut back some. Currently, when I invoke
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00870.html (8,868 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion Audio Distortion Continued (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:09:33 -0500
Bill, Don't know if this is related to your problem-- my Omni 6 does the same thing. I pull the plug, clean it and replug. Sometimes I have to position it just right for the raspy audio to disappear.
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00882.html (8,053 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion /O2 Drift PRoblem (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:36:30 -0500
However, being off frequency on SSB even 20 hz causes your audio to sound different and can be readily detected. When you add a drift of 20 hz to a rig that is already off a little bit anyway, and th
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg01014.html (8,480 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Code and everything else (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:50:01 -0500
Here is the link to the RUFZ top list. http://www.rufzxp.net/toplist.htm Check out the picture of K7QO at the top of the Senior Males list. Nice rig in the background ! 73, WA4TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00490.html (9,391 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Code and everything else (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:29:37 -0500
Just guessing but possibly John meant 200 characters per minute which would roughly equate to around 40 WPM. They have Fabian listed at 1000 characters/ min, which is 200WPM. K7QO is just a tad over
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00498.html (9,904 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:11:18 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "n4dsp" Perry, Dont be such a Downer!! Geez congratulate the guy for this remarkable achievement! Next thing someone will comment that the program does not have real life
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00510.html (10,129 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Please!! (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:53:13 -0500
"YEP" 73 es Merry Christmas to all, WA4TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00636.html (7,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu