Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa9ysd@yahoo.com: 183 ]

Total 183 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
What is the difference between putting a remote antenna tuner at the feed point of the antenna verses at the end of the feed line like most hams have for their installation? Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00079.html (7,243 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
I am tying to catch up with my reading. I had a tuner made for open feed line feeding an 80M folded dipole. I had 2 roller inductors in series with the feed line. I found that sweet point, balance on
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00156.html (8,864 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
--I think the antenna gets extended into the tuner's output parts that provide the reactance (when the tuner is at the antenna) to achieve resonance. And when that resonant Q is more than 1, there ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00157.html (9,022 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Just watched the video on the Omni VII sure looks like to be a better radio than the Omni VI Plus. Do not have enough cash to get one. Orion seams to have a lot of variables and be just a bit better
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00167.html (8,152 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
--I cannot remember if I had to touch the caps on the coil. If I did, it was not much.-- What I meant to say was I cannot remember if I had to touch the caps on the coil when going to 40M. If I did,
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00168.html (8,193 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 04:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
--I havem't made much sence about the matchbox not having much field strength readings on the higher feqs...any guesses? too small coil wire size perhaps?-- I cannot remember, did the match box have
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00169.html (8,619 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Logging Software (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Check out LogIC, Logger32 and a few others. Join their forums and monitor them for about 4 months. See what they are like and problems they have. One or 2 program I will not mention they just do not
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00203.html (8,262 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 05:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Did I hear this wrong? The Omni VII has an adjustable weight control on the internal keyer? Omni VI does not. I do not like the sound of the Omni VI internal keyer cause the weight is wrong. Not sure
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00205.html (9,059 bytes)

89. [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Some people like but radios cause they look for the one that operates well and has a nice feel to it or how it looks or what ever. I have gone through 6 different tuners and used a bunch more along w
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00207.html (8,380 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you all for them Omni VI Plus weighting and AEA interface card help. I remember reading about weight control a while back, I looked 3 times through the manual on Sunday and completely missed it
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00225.html (8,023 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Putting on a fly wheel helps to eliminate the drag. Once the caps are centered I adjust the roller inductor to minimum SWR. Then tune the caps and repeat starting with the roller inductor if necessar
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00230.html (7,935 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Omni 6+ great CW rig (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
By pressing N-1, N-1 filter is in use. Pressing N-2, N-2 turns off and N-2 is in use. By pressing N-2 while turned on N-2 is pressed again and N-2 turns off. On off is indicated by a green light abov
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00250.html (7,175 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ great CW rig (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
I need a proof reader. Pressing N-2, N-2 is in use. Pressing N-2 again, N-2 turns off. Is what I meant to say. Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD By pressing N-1, N-1 filter is in use. Pressing N-2, N-2
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00252.html (8,290 bytes)

94. [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
I had thought that the Omni 6 Plus time duration of the "Di" was too short when set to 1.0. My old AEA keyer sounded nice, I liked it. I had used a straight key for 10 years before I got the AEA keye
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00253.html (7,007 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ great CW rig (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
So N-1 is pressed on. When N-2 is pressed N-1 turns off. When N-2 is on and N-1 is pressed on, N-2 turns off. Manual says "Both IF's are cascaded such that the resulting receiver bandwidth is a combi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00262.html (8,156 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (Lyle Dunlap) (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
I had tried the MFJ 495 that a friend has. I still liked my AEA MM2. Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00302.html (6,581 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Interesting what it says is this publication http://www.somis.org/bbat.html He tells about the Sham of baluns and fully supports current baluns. Does not mention L networks as to why it will not give
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00318.html (7,782 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Only up to 21 MHZ, is because of too much inductance. Unun must be acting like a old fashion link coil with out the link. I did something like that with a single coil and had 3 pairs of taps. One pai
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00340.html (8,801 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
For what its worth. Johnson match box was very popular in its day. So people could not get it to work on 10M because of what ever. To long antenna, feed line issue what ever. Inductance was the probl
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00346.html (8,779 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
With the tuner Marinus built and the no 10M, what happens if one or two tunes were removed and still stay as a 50 : 450 ohm balun? Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD ____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00358.html (8,086 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
This search system is powered by Namazu