Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wb5jnc@centurytel.net: 291 ]

Total 291 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Strange FD RFI (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:28:44 -0500
Kim, "Hindsight" here - the definitive answer would have probably come if you could have briefly switched the '1000D over to a dummy load. That might help determine if the issue came from the RF or t
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00127.html (9,054 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation, Field Day in Hawaii (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:39:24 -0500
If you haven't already found it, check the FISTS site: http://www.fists.org/index.html Their "Basic CW Operating Manual" may be what you're looking for: http://www.fists.org/pdfdocs/A%20BASIC%20CW%20
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00194.html (11,633 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:56:02 -0500
Others may differ with my advice, but I'm not sure you really need to "finish the alphabet" before you start listening. As a suggestion, start listening to W1AW's code practice sessions - even the "h
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00040.html (9,645 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:04:34 -0500
One other thing (which can be a source of controversy for some folks): I was emphatically told (by my now SK dad who was first licensed in 1934 and served as a seagoing radio op in the Coast Guard du
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00055.html (9,956 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:35:26 -0500
Rick, Funny you should mention "sending with anything" - in one of my typical "oddball" moments I made a single-lever "picopaddle" out of a tiny SPDT contact assembly I salvaged out of a defunct CD-R
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00061.html (11,569 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:10:04 -0500
To borrow from an old quip: any fool can work DX with a kilowatt amp and a big antenna. It takes talent to do it with LPCA (Low Power, Crummy Antenna.) 73, Al ________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00064.html (10,648 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:26:48 -0500
My first Ten-Tec rig was a used '509 back around 1980. I previously had a Heath SB-102 but could never find a way to set it up on CW that didn't sound like a freight train with the sequence of relays
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00114.html (11,502 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:56:42 -0500
SRI Ray, I spoke too soon - the review was for the KR-1B, but I think it's the same mechanism as yours. Maybe I'm the one who needs to post a review.... 73, Al _______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00117.html (8,080 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec - Marketing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:14:22 -0500
Rick, Interesting - and at risk of starting a "flame war", I see somewhat of a parallel between the Ten-Tecs and a certain brand of automobile I like (which I suspect you see a lot of in Deutschland)
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00157.html (11,611 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] The Bands Are Dead (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:35:45 -0500
New one for Murphy? "The probability that a major ionospheric disturbance will disrupt HF communications is directly proportional to the cost of the antenna system you just installed." 73, Al _______
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00283.html (9,304 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:28:02 -0500
Too bad we're so widely scattered - it would be nice if a bunch of us with the older Ten-Tecs could get together in a "tech fest" for repairs and "tune-ups" like some of the antique/classic car folks
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00310.html (10,250 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Burnishing tool? (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:13:12 -0500
I thought the "eraser" method for cleaning edge contacts was to use a "Pink Pearl", which is a soft rubber compound and won't erase ink (at least not very well.) I'm inclined to agree that an ink era
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00347.html (9,704 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Soldering oxidized circuit cards (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:07:05 -0500
Stuart, The kit in question is the 1254 Digital Readout Superhet Receiver Kit. My manual (RX purchased used but I think it's the original manual) is not bound and looks like it was copied, or scanned
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00418.html (10,996 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] TT 580 Delta (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:22:37 -0500
Rick, While the Argosy and Delta had the same "look", there was considerable difference internally. The Argosy was an offshoot of the Argonaut/Triton single conversion 9 MHz IF setup, while the Delta
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00438.html (8,516 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] 40m BCI and Ten-Tec vs. Elecraft (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:40:04 -0500
Wade, Spoken like a true aficionado HI HI!! 73, Al _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00451.html (8,686 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:46:23 -0500
Bob, Point (2) is well taken. Back in the days of "vinyl" when I worked in small market radio I could hear when a stylus was getting "edgy" (chipped or worn); it had the same effect on me as a chalkb
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00113.html (10,594 bytes)

77. [TenTec] WTB: Argosy parts rig (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:43:05 -0500
Looking for an Argosy (analog or digital) "basket case" or parts rig. Please provide info on failure event or symptoms, physical/electrical condition, serial number, whether unit is "as failed" or if
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00284.html (7,143 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] for sale 302 remote encoder (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:59:17 -0500
Is it a straight '320 or a 320D? (There is a difference.) TNX/73, Al _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00324.html (8,129 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Model 282 filter problem (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:27:14 -0600
Mike, Before blaming the filter try tuning around and/or move the passband tuning control (PBT) back and forth a bit. The 282 has an extremely narrow peak and can sound like there's nothing there if
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00026.html (9,085 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Need parts for Argosy 525D (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:44:51 -0600
Roger, The 48057 is the stock 4 pole 2.4 KHz filter used in the 9 MHz IF of the Argosy and Corsair (560, not the 561 Corsair II.) The model 220 (or 48058) is the 8 pole version and is a "drop-in" rep
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00098.html (9,131 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu