Mail Archive Search: <+from:wn3vaw@fyi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@fyi.net: 178 ]

Total 178 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Users Net (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:57:41 -0400; I wasn't aware of how close things were with the Collins net. OK, I know 20 is always crowded, but surely the net can slide SOMEWHERE up or down a few and avoid the screwballs... right? 73, ron wn3va; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00264.html (9,044 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:38:26 -0400; Wait a minute... Ten Tec is being given a "black eye" for product support for not, at this time, offering a mod for an older radio to retrofit it for a band which we MAY get in a few months or years; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00279.html (10,046 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:22:18 -0400; I think we got a little snookered here guys... OK, I fell for it too. First, the original post had a somewhat incendiary crack about Ten Tec service that got everyone's dander up, mine included. That; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00282.html (10,013 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo list 18 June 02 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:30:53 -0400; Interesting that the used Argonaut II is selling for $100 more than a used Corsair II. That saying something... just not sure what! (and I sure wish I had the $$ for that Corsair, too!) 73, ron wn3va; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00273.html (10,710 bytes)
125. [TenTec] Off Topic: Programming Question (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:13:05 -0400; If there's anyone on the list familar with dBase V for Windows or Visual dBase 5.5 or 5.7, either the language itself or the compiler, please drop me a quick note. I'm doing a DOS to Windows conversi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00324.html (7,225 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:41:38 -0400; I think a request to the reviews manager for a more detailed explanation for this is in order before we jump to any conclusions or start saying things we might later regret. 73, ron wn3vaw "And they; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00395.html (12,649 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:57:20 -0400; I just went & found the review item in question. Sorry, it did not read like a product review, but a detailed explanation of a service problem he had with TenTec, specifically related to a back order; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00396.html (13,270 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:55:38 -0400; Be so as it may, it's still not a product review. 73, ron wn3vaw "And they give you cash, which is just as good as money!" Yogi Berra, AFLAC Commercial, 2002 How is he supposed to write about how it; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00402.html (16,161 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:43:40 -0400; Again, pending a reply from the eHam Review Sections Editor(s), let's not jump to conclusions as to WHY the aforementioned review was moved. We've already had a couple of implications that this was d; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00427.html (10,293 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] What's with the 526 (6N2)? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:31:36 -0400; Larry, Well, FWIW: Although I don't own a 526 (yet), Dave W3HND from my club does. I asked him a few weeks back what he thought about it when I found this out, and this is what he said: -- It's ok! i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00457.html (10,559 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V - taking orders now (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:37:49 -0400; I think we have to wait until the rig is in production before you'll see a product review. A review of one of the prototypes would be interesting but not neccesarily fully relevant. 73, ron wn3vaw "Y; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00133.html (9,195 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V - taking orders now (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:12:22 -0400; I'm curious. I know the first three Argonauts are the 505, 509, and 515. So if the new one is the fifth... which one did I miss seeing? (Must have blinked!) 73, ron wn3vaw "You are a fluke of the Uni; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00138.html (8,212 bytes)
133. [TenTec] Six of one Argonaut... (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:20:16 -0400; Thanks to everyone who's responded to date on my query on the "fourth" Argonaut in the series. Almost everyone's agreed that the first three are the 505, 509, and 515. But... -- Some people are telli; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00152.html (8,062 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Dayton and the 516 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:46:56 -0400; Considering that the two Argonaut V's were not production items yet, and considering the number of people handling the two rigs (you could not get near the 516 or the Orion on Friday), I wouldn't be; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00341.html (9,663 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] Dayton and the 516 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:49:44 -0400; Well, after I finally got a look at the 516 & the Orion on Friday, I got W3WH to come over and examine them too. Note to Scott: I sold that 516 for you -- the one Bill ordered on Saturday. Worked on; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00342.html (11,011 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Re: Dayton news: Orion concern (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:56:44 -0400; Cosmetics aren't everything, and from what I saw in terms of capabilities, I think the Orion will compete just fine. Not just Scott but all of the TenTec staff I talked to were very enthusiastic. Sor; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00343.html (9,695 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Re: Dayton news: Orion concern (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:56:26 -0400; One other general observation I thought I'd mention... There were big crowds on Friday at Kenwood, ICOM, Yaesu, and TenTec. At Yaesu, the crowds were the four big lines of people waiting to get their; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00349.html (9,990 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] screen (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:43:51 -0400; Actually John, I think the whole discussion of the screen color and knob esthetics and size of the logo are indicative of a major change in thinking on commercially built equipment. Should we be conc; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00389.html (11,410 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Orion Concern (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:21:29 -0400; Nah, the answer can't be that black-and-white. 73, ron wn3vaw "You are a fluke of the Universe You have no right to be here And whether you can hear it or not, The Universe is laughing behind your ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00463.html (8,352 bytes)
140. [TenTec] The Big Picture (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:08:59 -0400; Well, the good news is, Ten Tec gets a nice mention in the "Hamvention" article that is currently sitting at the ARRL web site. Both the Orion and the Argonaut V are specifically discussed. The bad n; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00484.html (7,151 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]