- 41. Re: [TenTec] Unfinished (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:08:20 -0500
- Sinisa: In general, I think that you are correct. ALL COMPANIES should meet their specs, but, sadly, few do. This applies across the board, not just to ham radios. But, I am satisfied with my Orion.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00447.html (8,342 bytes)
- 42. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:31:36 -0500
- Why don't you suggest that option to them? Nothing says that they can't have a DSP/CPU upgrade from time to time. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ would have _______________________________________________ TenTec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00798.html (9,235 bytes)
- 43. Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:06:09 -0500
- Clark: I guess it all depends on how you view the comments. Is the glass half full or is it half empty? I really don't find the comments posted on this board to be very heavy criticisms. No, not at a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00057.html (9,645 bytes)
- 44. Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:49:37 -0500
- Tommy: I got the 3 Element one. I understand that the really big one will not start shipping until the end of the Summer. I bought the 3 Element with the notion that sometime in the future I would re
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00059.html (8,981 bytes)
- 45. [TenTec] Orion and SteppIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:56:04 -0500
- After taking "care" of a few pine trees, I finally have my new 3 element SteppIR antenna up and operational. It sure seems to work well. The antenna patterns seem to be a little sharper than the TH-7
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00309.html (8,016 bytes)
- 46. Re: [TenTec] Orion and SteppIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:20:43 -0500
- Yes, my control box is the new one. I received the antenna the end of May. The control box has the 57,600 baud setting and the Orion as a transceiver option in the menu options. Matter of fact, I thi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00316.html (11,984 bytes)
- 47. Re: [TenTec] Orion Com Port Speed ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:25:33 -0500
- In the Orion Model 565 Programmer's Reference Guide, Revision 1.2, page 5, it says that "the interface parameters are fixed at 57,600 baud, No Parity, 8 Data bits, 1 Stop bit." You can download a cop
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00374.html (7,486 bytes)
- 48. [TenTec] Orion Firmware Updates (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:16:01 -0500
- The other night it was time for me to install the most recent version of the Orion software. My Orion is only a couple of months old and came with version 1.369, so this was to be my first attempt at
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00460.html (7,503 bytes)
- 49. Re: [TenTec] 7800 reviews (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:49:02 -0500
- I suspect that many new 7800 owners are going to be a little disappointed at the reviews and results. I also suspect that many bought the radio on the faith that ICOM would produce it according to "p
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00566.html (9,968 bytes)
- 50. [TenTec] SteppIR interface with the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:35:35 -0500
- Are any of you using the SteppIR transceiver interface with your Orion? I can't seem to get the interface to work between my Orion and the SteppIR control box. I have checked the pin outs on the conn
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00676.html (7,106 bytes)
- 51. [TenTec] Orion interface and the SteppIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:39:45 -0500
- I wanted to let everyone know that I have my new Orion successfully interfaced with my new 3 element SteppIR antenna. I would like to thank everyone that responded and especially George, KF9YR, who w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00894.html (6,960 bytes)
- 52. Re: [TenTec] No Orion Update (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:37 -0500
- I don't have any problem with these so called "dry spells." My Orion works just fine and that REALLY is the way that I like it. I have been reading some of the Icom and Yeasu boards and I really beli
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00958.html (9,097 bytes)
- 53. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:53:02 -0500
- I noticed the same thing as I started getting to know my new Orion. I think that part of the confusion is that the roofing filters are not the signal bandwidth filters that we are used to seeing adve
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00240.html (11,835 bytes)
- 54. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:05:38 -0500
- Steve: All I can say is that you are wrong. Please review the Orion diagrams and schematics. They not the same as what we were used to 30 years ago. Period! 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ to has both audio I th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00245.html (18,298 bytes)
- 55. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:41:01 -0500
- Steve: I was just looking at the schematic diagram of my FT-1000 to see if I could determine the filter bandwidth going into the receiver front end. I didn't see it called out on the set of diagrams
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00249.html (23,710 bytes)
- 56. Re: [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:42:55 -0500
- Bill: Do you care to comment on the discussion that Steve and I are having? You seem to know your Orion inside and out. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00250.html (9,655 bytes)
- 57. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 06:13:36 -0500
- Thanks Bill. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ I order is. in with fairly they announced a in in if I heavy 1.8 rag still The because _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00272.html (13,466 bytes)
- 58. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 07:19:04 -0500
- It looks like Steve and I have sparked a very interesting discussion about roofing filters. My original premise was that in the automatic mode, both the 1.8 and 2.4 kHz filters were too narrow becaus
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00277.html (10,712 bytes)
- 59. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:02:34 -0500
- Bill and Barry: I'll try using the PBT with the DSP set to 1.6 - 1.8 kHz. Thanks for the tip. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00298.html (9,391 bytes)
- 60. Re: [TenTec] N4PY Software User's Group (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:17:35 -0500
- Carl: I saw where you were "flamed" on the ICOM board the other day. Too bad, I think if you were doing anything wrong the board moderators would have told you. In my opinion, the whole discussion we
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00802.html (8,361 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu