Mail Archive Search: <+from:zl1mh@xtra.co.nz>

Results:

References: [ +from:zl1mh@xtra.co.nz: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ Rx "Noise" (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:04:12 +1200; Am not sure if this problem is the same one that exist(ed) in some of the 'straight 6s' (mine included), which, at mainly the wider filter widths and at other than slow tuning rates, had the bands (m; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00260.html (7,609 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Lithium RAM-backup batteries as Omni VI (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 13:36:19 +1200; Lithium button-cells with solder-tag connectors seem hard to find here, but the ones with no tags are abundant - probably cheaper too! Has anybody tried soldering tags onto these cells? any explosion; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00180.html (7,045 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Lithium Batteries. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:56:53 +1200; Thanks to everyone for the replies. Hope I replied to everyone individually. If I can't get them with solder tags, I'll go the holder way. Too many people warned against soldering & I'm a coward so w; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00188.html (6,691 bytes)
4. [TenTec] QRM/QRNN (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 18:30:20 +1200; It should not be too much of a major job to access the Rx side of the rig's tx/rx changeover and insert the QRM/QRNN phasing unit at that spot in the circuit, just a thought !! By the way, when I stu; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00025.html (7,570 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI VI Bandstacking. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:55:43 +1200; Greetings All! Just noticed today whilst chasing 3B9R, that the Bandstacking register for 160m on my OMNI VI (ver 1 upgrade), ain't working. There is no reaction at all when I push the bandswitch a s; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00096.html (7,270 bytes)
6. [TenTec] OMNI VI Bandstacking. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (Mike Hutchins); Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:07:26 +1200; My thanks to all for the replies. A Full Reset did the trick - funny how we humans usually suspect the worst before we try the simple (or is it only me?!!) 73 to all. Mike, ZL1MH -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00102.html (6,650 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Digests. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 16:51:27 +1300; Digest #043 was the last one I received here. Can anybody please email me direct & let me know if there have been any sent since #043? Thanks & 73. Mike. ZL1MH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00080.html (6,614 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Digests (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 17:57:05 +1300; Ref my earlier posting.....Digests #45 & #46 just received! My thanks to whoever! 73. Mike, ZL1MH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrat; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00082.html (6,645 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Steve vs Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 18:53:50 +1300; I note that Steve has been the only foreign (alien) ham upto now to have any input into this debate. As another foreigner (alien), I, initially had a little problem with NIL replies from Ten-Tec rega; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00050.html (7,518 bytes)
10. [TenTec] "Steve vs Ten-Tec" (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 06:35:20 +1300; OOOOOps!!! For "Steve" pse read Alec/SP2EWQ. Sri for the error and apologies to all the Steves out there! 73. Mike, ZL1MH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00057.html (6,604 bytes)
11. [TenTec] OMNI VI Filters. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 09:01:34 +1300; Do any other c.w. ops using the OMNI VI ever wish for an intermediate filter between the wide 1.8 and the narrow 500hz, for use when "tuning around"? I have a (non-Ten-Tec) rig with a 1.0Khz filter w; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00058.html (7,002 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Digest #641 + OMNI for CW. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 18:50:11 +1300; Can somebody please forward me Digest #641? Seems like my server had some problems Sunday our time (Saturday in U.S.) and no email got to me that day! Thanks in advance! ALSO, ref CW/SSB use, my OMNI; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00108.html (6,919 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Keith/AA5AC/1 - Corsair "clicking". (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 19:04:48 +1300; Keith, am not trying to teach Granny how to suck eggs, but did you try turning off, or varying, the 'noise blanker'? - often distortion caused by the NB whilst on CW will sound like bad clicks on str; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00251.html (7,061 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Tom/KD7DMH. Starting with CW. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 19:45:14 +1300; Good move Tom, am sure you won't regret it!! All advice given has been good! - However, unless you fall into the "cost don't matter" category, and until you're SURE that CW is for you - go for someth; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00278.html (7,405 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Seasons' Greetings (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 18:06:54 +1300; With our Christmas Day near ended, can I wish all of you who are still looking forward to the day, all the very best from down here. May we all have a fine & peaceful New Year with many good dx openi; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00377.html (6,654 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni VI clicks/thumps (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 19:03:27 +1300; My Omni VI is s/n 05A10575, with PLUS, option 1, upgrade. Sidetone has always been disappointing, but all the other Omni VI advantages outweigh this! My sidetone problem has been 'thumpiness' rather; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00286.html (7,706 bytes)
17. [TenTec] missing Digests. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 18:36:04 +1300; Greetings to All! For some unknown reason, I didn't receive Digests # 595, 595 and 596. Could some kind person please send me these direct? Won't know if I missed anything until I see what I missed!; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00266.html (6,644 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Ten-Tec alignment info. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 08:57:44 +1200; Ref. alignment instructions. For what its worth, the manual for my Argonaut 505 DOES have fairly good alignment info. for each relevant module. 73 to all, Good Luck to the new "editor" - and thanks t; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00018.html (6,656 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Argonaut 505. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 15:05:13 +1200; Has anybody tried fitting a narrower (for c.w.) IF filter into the old 505 ? If so, is there a standard type "other rig spare" that will do the job ? I'm not a big fan of AF filters, but would like t; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00129.html (6,675 bytes)
20. [TenTec] reflector digest. (score: 1): Author: zl1mh@xtra.co.nz (mike hutchins); Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 06:33:44 +1200; Greetings to all. Mot sure why, but I have had no "Reflector digests" since #555. Can someone email me & advise if there has been anything subsequent to Guess the reflector could be "down", in which; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00160.html (6,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]