Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:40:09 -0500; Only you can decide if the II is worth the ~$1700 difference (no tuner) between a used Orion and a new O2. Ten-Tec's words follow with my **comments**: ** What is new about the ORION II ? Super brig; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00318.html (10,170 bytes)
2. Re: [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:13:15 -0500; Does anyone understand this point? I used to think all the Orion (1) frequencies were derived from the TCXO. I've had reasonable luck tweaking the oscillator for better accuracy, as have others. I ty; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00324.html (8,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]