Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Topband\:\s+BDR\s+redux\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Topband\:\s+BDR\s+redux\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:24:22 -0600; I think you totally misunderstand AGC THRESHOLD as applied in the Orion. The RF gain control in the less modern receivers you refer to does much more than simply change, as a byproduct, AGC threshol; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00086.html (8,025 bytes)
2. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:41:06 -0500; This is true. It's certainly better to have a separate AGC threshold, as in Orion. Unfortunately, AGC Threshold control on Orion is an ergonomic disaster. It should have had a knob assigned to itself; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00093.html (7,755 bytes)
3. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:52:59 -0600; The crash of the Hindenburg was a disaster. The threshold control can be set up to be one button push away ... Not sure I understand why adjusting THRESHOLD should have any impact on S-Meter indicat; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00095.html (7,920 bytes)
4. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:26:57 -0500; That's exactly too much for me :-) I'm not sure either, just a though that it's position should be indicated in relation to signal levels presented on the S meter. Those 5-digit microvolts (with ~1 d; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00097.html (7,907 bytes)
5. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Dick Foster" <w5ta@austin.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 00:27:26 -0600; If I were given the opportunity to re-design the front panel of the Orion, it would be at least twice the size and have two complete sets of knobs for both the main and sub-receivers including a lot; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00134.html (9,126 bytes)
6. RE: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 07:48:54 +0100; And Dick, you'd probably call it "Edsul" ;-) 73 Rick If I were given the opportunity to re-design the front panel of the Orion, it would be at least twice the size and have two complete sets of knobs; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00136.html (9,982 bytes)
7. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 08:49:40 -0600; sets The 7800 is sort of built that way -- but with concentric controls, and that typical puny tuning knob for the second receiver. But for about the same price, you could buy three Orions, rack and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00142.html (8,444 bytes)
8. [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:04:24 -0500; to relate to actual band conditions in a short time. I do this by ear turning Threshold up until background noise drops to a reasonable level. How difficult is that? I could do it blindfolded without; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00159.html (7,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]