Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\"PTT\s+CW\"\s+vs\.\s+PTT\-controlled\s+CW\s+redux\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\"PTT\s+CW\"\s+vs\.\s+PTT\-controlled\s+CW\s+redux\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] "PTT CW" vs. PTT-controlled CW redux (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:14:27 -0500; At 09:19 AM 2/27/04 -0600, you wrote: K5SF wrote: I think the PTT is a similar issue. I've heard of at least one contesting club move whole heartedly into the Orion, I've heard others shy away for la; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00875.html (11,301 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] "PTT CW" vs. PTT-controlled CW redux (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:52:06 -0600; Scott: Thank you for your post. And thank you for listening. Spriit is taken as intended. You are right about the issue that if a modification is done to force the relays to TX and mute the audio, It; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00880.html (12,918 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] "PTT CW" vs. PTT-controlled CW redux (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:00:04 -0500; I don't think that's "all that's needed". Here's what's actually needed. Upon PTT closure the transmitter must get ready to send CW code before the first keying pulse arrives in order to avoid choppi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00894.html (7,768 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] "PTT CW" vs. PTT-controlled CW redux (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:23:20 +0000; Hi Scott: Thanks for the information, but I'm afraid I didn't understand your posting. I think this is largely semantics, but let me ask a couple of questions so we are speaking the same language. 1.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00900.html (12,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]