Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\:\s+SUB\-RX\:\s+TEN\s+TEC\s+\-\s+ORION\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Ascani Adriano" <adrianoascani@virgilio.it>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:35:09 +0200
HI ALL My name is Adriano, im from Italy. If can i would ask you something about TENTEC ORION 565 AT. I received it first days of august/2004. i try to explain you wath i have noted not good using it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00494.html (8,848 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:38:00 -0400
Adriano, I just tried your example here on 40 meters with my Orion main receiver antenna and sub-receiver antenna both set to antenna 1. I am receiving a signal of S 6 on the main receiver and 5 line
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00496.html (9,550 bytes)

3. RE: [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Eric SENSI" <eric.sensi@skynet.be>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:11:08 +0200
Ciao Adriano, Ho comperato uno ORION anche da venti giorni ora, io abitare in Belgio, Liegi. Normalmente la qualit&agrave; del suono che esce dai due ricevitori deve essere identica. Quando ascolto i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00497.html (11,213 bytes)

4. [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:02:05 -0400
Ciao Adriano, Just to make sure you don't have a setup problem, please try the following checklist: Left block under S-Meter: Main TX/RX ANT 1 ON, Sub RX ANT 1 ON VFO A: TX ON, RX ON VFO B: Sub RX ON
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00501.html (8,514 bytes)

5. [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:24:49 -0400
Hi All, I omitted setting GAIN = 100 for both Main and Sub in my checklist below. Corrected checklist follows: Ciao Adriano, Just to make sure you don't have a setup problem, please try the following
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00507.html (8,697 bytes)

6. [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Ascani Adriano" <adrianoascani@virgilio.it>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 01:05:05 +0200
Thanks dear Carl, i am doing all the tests with my ORION, but the reception of the SUB-RX is a true disaster,_ Long wawes and Medium wawes i can say don't exist, in receiveing a signal with S = 8/9 y
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00051.html (7,667 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Eric SENSI" <eric.sensi@skynet.be>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:29:13 +0200
the ROOF-FILTER 1.8Khz ? Mandatory on 40m ! Not so important if you're not on a crowded band with stations putting out some serious KW of RF just above and under your operating frequency - then the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00053.html (8,261 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] : SUB-RX: TEN TEC - ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:46:00 -0400
It sounds like the antenna is not connected to the sub-receiver. Assuming you only have one antenna connected to the Orion in the "Antenna 1" connector, make sure the Orion front panel on the left si
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00054.html (8,252 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu