Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\?\?QSK\s+GONE\s+AWAY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\?\?QSK\s+GONE\s+AWAY\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:18:37 -0000; Has anyone other than Tom tested the QSK. Tom says his QSK works at 70 WPM! Mine doesn't even have QSK. Tom are you really hearing between your dits at 70WPM? I can only hear at 15. I've reinstalled,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00688.html (7,701 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Uhlman" <tuhlman@kimbanet.com>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:14:35 -0400; I have tested mine with ver 1.370 and I believe you're right in that there is a tiny delay after a dit or dah before the receiver comes back on... So, I can't here the receiver between the dits... I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00689.html (9,603 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 20:42:09 -0000; Yes indeed it helps! With the older versions, QSK was virtually instantaneous. Now it is slightly slower than the fastest VOX setting on my IC-706 therefore it cannot be defined as QSK by any means.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00690.html (10,941 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:34:57 -0400; Nope. I'll have to confess to you and all, I do not sit around and test full QSK between dits!! When I say my Orion QSK works good at 70 wpm, what I really mean is that if my QSO partner breaks me, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00695.html (10,382 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:42:52 EDT; Wow, 70 WPM, you got to be kidding! Hearing between dits, at that kind of speed WOW! Hats off to you guys that can go even close to that fast. Wow, at 55 years young I'm lucky to kep up with 18 WPM.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00696.html (6,645 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 18:58:24 -0700 (PDT); Straight key works fine for me on 1.370 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains ? Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer ___________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00698.html (12,769 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 01:58:48 +0000; QSK gone away? Not on my Orion. I can hear another station between dits at what the MFJ 493 keyer says is 60 - and with what the internal keyer says is 60. So I certainly have QSK - at speeds higher; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00699.html (7,409 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Uhlman" <tuhlman@kimbanet.com>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:14:07 -0400; OK I just tested my Orion with many different settings and here's what I found.... First I did a master reset... Using the internal keyer I have found that the receiver recover time decreases when th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00700.html (8,900 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: Ken Hunter <kenh@hunters.org>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:25:03 -0400; Ya - no kidding... I've been thinking the same thing while reading this thread... Hearing a break at that kind of speed - you folks must have some really fast processors in your brains - LOL. I'd lik; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00707.html (8,844 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:40:40 -0400; what the MFJ 493 keyer says is 60 - and with what the internal keyer says is 60. So I certainly have QSK - at speeds higher than I ever want to run. When it comes to CW I prefer city speed limits to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00711.html (10,690 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:52:48 -0400; Well, it is a 'requirement' to run full QSK at the higher speeds, as far as I'm concerned. No one needs to be able to hear between the dits, but you do need to hear between the words. But Ken, if you; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00713.html (9,912 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Kip Glunt" <r5lul3j02@sneakemail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 10:39:40 -0400; is would I noticed this to Tom! Very touchy to adjust! The "Menu Delay" setting doesn't help either. But not sure what this setting is suppose to do? I don't see it doing anything ... HI! 73's ... Ki; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00716.html (8,870 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:58:52 +0000; Hi Tommy: Well, K5TO is 66, I'm 69 myself, and way too much playing with high powered short barreled rifles has left me about like Red Skelton's Cauliflower McPug. So it's easier for me to run a litt; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00719.html (10,478 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Troy Wideman" <w6hv@surfbest.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 10:24:03 -0700; So does my bug, John. 73, Troy, W6HV -- Original Message -- From: "John Sheeley" <wb4qda@yahoo.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE A; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00725.html (14,125 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]