Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[Orion\]\s+FT9000\s+ETR\s+available\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[Orion\]\s+FT9000\s+ETR\s+available\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] FT9000 ETR available (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:20:12 +0000; Indeed, Rob is providing some food for thought for the amateur community - "technical innovation" has certainly bloated the price of Icom and Yaesu's $10,000 flagships, but their upconversion main re; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00218.html (7,209 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] FT9000 ETR available (score: 1): Author: "Byron J. Watts" <bjw@byron.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:49:07 -0600; hehe, in america marketing is more important than anythign else (so i've noted at least..) the big companies can afford to market their "big" radios and that's all that matters. I must say though ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00222.html (7,934 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] FT9000 ETR available (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:45:46 EST; Dunno, but my working assumption has always been that Yaesu/Kenwood/Icom tend to design radios with SSB primarily in mind, then add CW, while Ten-Tec works the other way around. 73, Ray W2RS ________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00227.html (7,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]