- 1. [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1)
- Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com (KD7EFQ@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:37:42 EDT
- I guess acceptance is the word here. Since 60 mtrs is going to be U.S. only, not DX, then it isn't that big a deal anyway. ( I understand that the AMers are trying to make it exclusively AM like 30mt
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00283.html (7,105 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1)
- Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:22:18 -0400
- I think we got a little snookered here guys... OK, I fell for it too. First, the original post had a somewhat incendiary crack about Ten Tec service that got everyone's dander up, mine included. That
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00287.html (9,771 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1)
- Author: crrandal@earthlink.net (Cara and Randy Randall)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:39:5 -0500
- I don't know why they would not make a transverter. They make a couple (20m to 6m and 2m to 6) for 6 meters and one for 10m to 2m AND there was a mod in QST to put the 2m transverter on 220Mhz. You n
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00290.html (10,861 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1)
- Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:02:10 -0500
- I checked the PA of the 1209 that I built a couple years ago. It was still working with full gain and full power output at 10 MHz (lowest I had a decent calibrated signal generator at the time). The
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00294.html (7,882 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] 60 mtr band (score: 1)
- Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 19:55:38 -0500
- Actually, on a list, I see a ham from U. K. posted an announcement from their licensing authority that they are allowing an experimental variance to their Class A license to experiment at 5 MHz. So i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00313.html (6,877 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu