Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ADMIN\:\s+\"The\s+message\'s\s+content\s+type\s+was\s+not\s+explicitly\s+allowed\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ADMIN\:\s+\"The\s+message\'s\s+content\s+type\s+was\s+not\s+explicitly\s+allowed\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ADMIN: "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed" (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:24:06 -0600; Gang, This is a very misleading error message. It is not a comment on the quality of the message. What it really means, is that your message was not composed in plain text. Many e-mail clients defaul; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00046.html (7,259 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ADMIN: "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed" (score: 1): Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 06:54:24 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Thanks, Jim. Keep up the good work. 73 Scott K4VWK --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00056.html (8,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]