Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+AGC\s+Response\s+2\.037j\s+v\s+2\.059d\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:00:50 -0500
Finally got both the v2 Orion and the Orion II up on a multi-coupler so I can listen on both simultaneously. Regarding the comments about the AGC on 2.037 sounding "fast", I agree. If one can presume
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00181.html (8,359 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:52:43 -0700
My guess about the faster decay on O2 with 2.037J is that short pulses cause a fast attack, followed by a fast release. On very strong SSB signals, this is most noticeable since the S-meter moves dow
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00186.html (9,796 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:59:37 -0500
The point was that behavior is NOT the same on both v2 and Orion II versions. Seems it should be, and it is not. There's no need for AGC hang on the v2 Orion to smooth things out. I recognize there
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00194.html (8,013 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:15:11 -0400
Has anyone figured out if the notches in 2.059d and 2.037j are back in the AGC loop or are still outside the AGC loop? I have been away from home and I cannot test this myself until Sunday afternoon.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00198.html (9,273 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:35:29 -0500
They do not appear to have been relocated. Same behavior as in ealier v2/II releases. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00200.html (7,708 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu