Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+\"regulation\s+by\s+bandwidth\"\s+NOW\s+ON\s+TOPIC\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+\"regulation\s+by\s+bandwidth\"\s+NOW\s+ON\s+TOPIC\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" NOW ON TOPIC! (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:07:21 EDT; of incentive licensing. It was FCC; ARRL did what could be done to make what FCC was going to do anyway as acceptable as possible to the masses. <<<<<<< That is not how I recall it. ARRL got its butt; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00417.html (8,739 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" NOW ON TOPIC! (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:23:24 -0000; to do Incentive guaranteed you iNTERESTING. woNDER HOW WELL IT WOULD WORK. iF i WERE A NUT WHO LIKED TO PROduce rotten sigs and my rig was fixed so I couldn't, I would just switch models/brands <GR>.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00435.html (10,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]