- 1. [TenTec] Actual TT219 250 Hz Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:54:34 -0400
- N4PY: Thanks Carl...exactly what I needed and how I measured the 500 Hz! Now I'm wondering why the 500 Hz was so far off. Guess I'll go ahead and exchange for a 219! K0CQ: That's a standard depth for
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00176.html (7,385 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Actual TT219 250 Hz Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <geraldj@isunet.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:32:05 -0500
- I stand corrected. I didn't know there were such manuals on the unofficial Tentec pages. Made use of it immediately. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00177.html (7,476 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Actual TT219 250 Hz Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:33:03 -0400
- N4PY: W4ZV: Now I'm wondering why the 500 Hz was so far off. Mystery solved. The filter was actually a 218 which is plainly marked on the top of one of the crystals nearest the center. I had set my D
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00200.html (7,779 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu