Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] antenna tuner (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Bill Hawkins); Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 07:19:21 -0500; I need a kw antenna tuner. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00279.html (6,630 bytes)
2. [TenTec] antenna tuner (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:12:42 -0400; How about a Ten Tec Model 4229 KW antenna tuner for $200.00 which would include shipping? 73, de Joe AA4NN Eastern Top Band ARC, Carolina DX Association, Carolina CW Ops eeetet ee -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00303.html (6,802 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 23:40:37 +0000; Mike you mention that you won't have the luxurie of running a balanced tuner at your new QTH. I do not understand. A balanced feed will always have the lowest losses, regardless what antenna you hang; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00024.html (7,573 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 02:13:14 +0000; That's where TwinCom comes into its own. Baluns are only good if you have a matched (tuned) aerial whereas I am using something that is not matched, in other words impedances are all over the place,; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00029.html (9,306 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <mjloewensteijn@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 06:05:41 +0000; Jim I think we have arrived at the "Let's agree to disagree stage". IMHO I think that you look at things too much in isolation. To me the use of chokes is only a patch method trying to minimize the e; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00035.html (8,802 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 19:00:32 -0700; Not necessarily. There's some excellent work reported in one of the ARRL Antenna Compendiums showing that window line is quite lossy when it's wet. I suggest that you (and anyone else who thinks a ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00072.html (8,766 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 20:59:19 -0700; ?a choke or balun that will handle 25 - 5000 Ohms over the HF You have some mistaken ideas. See my tutorial. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00074.html (8,289 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 10:07:47 -0700; I look at things as they work in the real world, not in a theoretically ideal one. Ham antennas are almost never balanced, and BECAUSE they are not balanced, any common mode current on the feedline W; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00075.html (8,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]