Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antw\:\s+Re\:\s+Yaesu\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antw\:\s+Re\:\s+Yaesu\s+comparison\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Antw: Re: Yaesu comparison (score: 1): Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:53:45 +0100; *snip* *snip* *more snip* Fully agree with all above. I do confirm that benchmark testing is not the same as the on the air result. I still not understand why everyone compares **dead carriers**. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00059.html (11,864 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Antw: Re: Yaesu comparison (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:26:33 -0600 (CST); Should one desire to "hear" a radio fall apart, feed a modulated carrier at some level and measure the THD+n at the audio output at near rated audio output. Some of the best touted radios on the mark; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00066.html (13,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]